History of the modern epidemiological concept of confounding

  title={History of the modern epidemiological concept of confounding},
  author={Alfredo Morabia},
  journal={Journal of Epidemiology \& Community Health},
  pages={297 - 300}
  • A. Morabia
  • Published 2010
  • Medicine
  • Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health
The epidemiological concept of confounding has had a convoluted history. It was first expressed as an issue of group non-comparability, later as an uncontrolled fallacy, then as a controllable fallacy named confounding, and, more recently, as an issue of group non-comparability in the distribution of potential outcome types. This latest development synthesised the apparent disconnect between phases of the history of confounding. Group non-comparability is the essence of confounding, and the… Expand
Confounding in ( non-) randomized comparison studies FES
Introduction The term confounding is commonly used in epidemiologic research. However, the use of this term sometimes leads to confusion. In the literature confounding is defined according to atExpand
On the definition of a confounder
This work considers a number of candidate definitions of a confounder arising from various more informal statements made in the literature, and proposes that a "confounder" be defined as a pre-exposure covariate C for which there exists a set of other covariates X such that effect of the exposure on the outcome is unconfounded conditional on (X, C). Expand
Control of confounding in the analysis phase – an overview for clinicians
This article provides an overview of standard methods in the analysis phase, such as stratification, standardization, multivariable regression analysis and propensity score (PS) methods, together with the more advanced high-dimensional propensity Score (HD-PS) method. Expand
Confounding and collinearity in regression analysis: a cautionary tale and an alternative procedure, illustrated by studies of British voting behaviour
Three empirical examples are deployed to address the potential impact of inter-relationships among independent variables in regression model results and how they are interpreted in the light of prior expectations, with results which suggest considerable problems. Expand
The Confounding Question of Confounding Causes in Randomized Trials
  • J. Fuller
  • Medicine, Psychology
  • The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
  • 2019
A thought experiment is run, the CONFOUND study, and a new account of causal inference in ideal and real comparative group studies is suggested that helps clarify the roles of confounding variables and randomization. Expand
Dependence of confounding on the target population: a modification of causal graphs to account for co-action.
A simple revision to the basic approach to detecting confounding in DAGs is proposed that makes confounding in the presence of causal interaction easier to evaluate visually and extends to other scenarios involving other target populations and variables with multiple levels. Expand
Predicting ‘Who Voted for Brexit’ Through Ecological Analysis – An Example of the Problem of Confounding, and its Resolution
In a recent paper Becker et al. have analysed the pattern of voting at the UK’s 2016 Referendum on membership of the EU, testing four hypotheses with a wide range of variables. Re-analysis of theirExpand
Comparison of results obtained with the help of the standardization with statistical methods (logistic regression and analysis of covariance) in solving the problem of human ecology, has shown that obtaining close results is possible if there will be met exactly conditions for the applicability of statistical methods. Expand
A counterfactual approach to bias and effect modification in terms of response types
A hitherto unrecognized sufficient condition to estimate effect measures in observational studies by adjusting for confounding bias is shown and the present findings would be of great use when demonstrating the inherent distinctions between observational studies and randomized controlled trials. Expand
Causal Criteria in Medical and Biological Disciplines: History, Essence, and Radiation Aspect. Report 1. Problem Statement, Conception of Causes and Causation, False Associations
Examination of the conceptual formulation and relevance of the problem, including weak penetration of specific methodologies for causation proving into experimental and descriptive disciplines that study the effects of the radiation factor on living organisms, indicates the need to use standardized criteria for assessing the truth of causality. Expand


Causality in epidemiology
  • P. Vineis
  • Medicine
  • Sozial- und Präventivmedizin
  • 2003
Epidemiology has evolved from a monocausal to a multicausal concept of the "web of causation", thus mimicking a similar and much earlier shift in the social sciences, but is both more sensitive to underlying biological models and more prone to a simplification of the causal pathways. Expand
Control of confounding in the assessment of medical technology.
It is given that the decision of whether a recorded variable is a confounder in a data-set must be decided on the basis of subject-matter knowledge and clinical judgement; statistical selection procedures based on significant tests, such as stepwise regression, can be particularly misleading. Expand
Confounding: essence and detection.
In case-referent studies confounding can arise in two ways: a priori confounders are correlates of exposure in the joint source population of cases and reference subjects; also, they are determinants of diagnosing the illness or have different selection implications between cases and referents. Expand
Confounding and Collapsibility in Causal Inference
Consideration of confounding is fundamental to the design and analysis of studies of causal effects. Yet, apart from confounding in experimental designs, the topic is given little or no discussion inExpand
Epidemiologic methods in clinical trials
Epidemiologic methods developed to control confounding in non‐experimental studies are equally applicable for experiments, where the extent of confounding for each risk indicator should be assessed, and if sufficiently large, controlled. Expand
Identifiability, exchangeability, and epidemiological confounding.
A logical connection is drawn between the concepts of identifiability, exchangeability, and confounding, which allows one to view the problem of confounding as arising from problems of ident ifiability, and provides further justification for confounder definitions based on comparability of exposure groups, as opposed to collapsibility-based definitions. Expand
The foundations of confounding in epidemiology
Abstract A statistically coherent view of confounding motivated by the over controversy over the proper control of confounding in the presence of prior knowledge is presented. Confounding by aExpand
The history of confounding
SummaryConfounding is a basic problem of comparability-and therefore has always been present in science. Originally a plain English word, it acquired more specific meanings in epidemiologic thinkingExpand
Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease.
The role and limitations of retrospective investigations of factors possibly associated with the occurrence of a disease are discussed and their relationship to forward-type studies emphasized.Expand
Epidemiology: An epistemological perspective
The term “epidemiology” is a source of confusion about the nature of this discipline. For the public, “epidemiology” evokes a medical discipline that deals with large-scale outbreaks of infectiousExpand