History and publication trends in the diffusion and early uptake of indirect comparison meta-analytic methods to study drugs: animated coauthorship networks over time

@inproceedings{Ban2018HistoryAP,
  title={History and publication trends in the diffusion and early uptake of indirect comparison meta-analytic methods to study drugs: animated coauthorship networks over time},
  author={Joann K. Ban and Mina Tadrous and Amy Xiaoxu Lu and Erin A Cicinelli and Suzanne M Cadarette},
  booktitle={BMJ open},
  year={2018}
}
OBJECTIVE To characterise the early diffusion of indirect comparison meta-analytic methods to study drugs. DESIGN Systematic literature synthesis. DATA SOURCES Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science. STUDY SELECTION English language papers that used indirect comparison meta-analytic methods to study the efficacy or safety of three or more interventions, where at least one was a drug. DATA EXTRACTION The number of publications and authors was… CONTINUE READING
9
Twitter Mentions

Similar Papers

Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 41 REFERENCES

Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons.

  • Statistics in medicine
  • 2002
VIEW 5 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

Indirect comparisons: methods and validity

Haute Autorité de Santé
  • Saint-Denis: Haute Autorité de Santé,
  • 2009
VIEW 3 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

A comparison of national guidelines for network meta-analysis.

  • Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research
  • 2014