Histological Comparison of Healing Following Tooth Extraction With Ridge Preservation Using Mineralized vs . Demineralized Freeze Dried Bone Allograft

@inproceedings{Wood2011HistologicalCO,
  title={Histological Comparison of Healing Following Tooth Extraction With Ridge Preservation Using Mineralized vs . Demineralized Freeze Dried Bone Allograft},
  author={Robert A. Wood and Brian L. Mealey},
  year={2011}
}
Background: Allografts such as demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) and mineralized FDBA are commonly used by clinicians for ridge preservation procedures. The primary objective of this study is to histologically evaluate and compare the healing of non-molar extraction sockets grafted with DFDBA vs. FDBA for ridge preservation. The secondary aim of this study is to compare dimensional changes in ridge height and width following grafting with these two materials. 

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 23 references

Ridge preservation techniques for implant therapy.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants • 2009
View 2 Excerpts

Histologic evaluation of socket augmentation with mineralized human allograft.

The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry • 2008
View 1 Excerpt

The influence of Bio-Oss collagen on healing of an extraction socket: An experimental study in the dog

M Araújo, E Lindhe, J Wennstrom, J. Lindhe
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28:123-135 • 2008
View 1 Excerpt

A study of the fate of the buccal wall of extraction sockets of teeth with prominent roots

M Nevins, M Camelo, S DePaoli
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent • 2006
View 2 Excerpts

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…