Histamine dose-response curves in asthma: reproducibility and sensitivity of different indices to assess response.

Abstract

In 18 clinically stable asthmatic patients histamine inhalation challenges were performed with a Wright's nebuliser and tidal volume breathing for two minutes on two to four occasions for each subject at a maximum interval of two weeks. The response was measured in terms of specific lung conductance (sGL) by the subtraction technique, maximum partial and maximum complete expiratory flow at 40% and 50% of vital capacity respectively (Vmax40p and Vmax50c), and FEV1 from the maximum flow-volume curve. Dose-response curves were analysed for (1) provocative concentration (PC) of histamine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 and a 40% change in the other measurements; (2) threshold concentration (TC)--the concentration at which changes in the measurement exceed 2 SD from control values; (3) reactivity (R)--the slope of the dose-response curve beyond TC. We found that PC20-FEV1 was the most reproducible index, the 95% confidence intervals based on a single determination being +/- 1.6 single two-fold concentration difference. PC20-FEV1 was more reproducible than PC values for other measurements and more reproducible than any of the TC values. The 95% confidence intervals based on a single determination of R varied from +/- 52% to +/- 74% change/log histamine concentration. Both sGL and Vmax40p detected the bronchoconstrictor response assessed by PC and TC at a significantly lower histamine concentration than FEV1 (p less than 0.01 and p less than 0.05 respectively). PC and TC results showed a significant correlation, but neither were correlated with R.

6 Figures and Tables

Statistics

0102030'86'89'92'95'98'01'04'07'10'13'16
Citations per Year

176 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 176 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Dehaut1983HistamineDC, title={Histamine dose-response curves in asthma: reproducibility and sensitivity of different indices to assess response.}, author={P Dehaut and A Rachiele and Ricardo Romero Mart{\'i}n and J L Malo}, journal={Thorax}, year={1983}, volume={38 7}, pages={516-22} }