Hindsight Bias

  title={Hindsight Bias},
  author={Neal J. Roese and Kathleen D. Vohs},
  journal={Perspectives on Psychological Science},
  pages={411 - 426}
  • N. Roese, K. Vohs
  • Published 1 September 2012
  • Psychology
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science
Hindsight bias occurs when people feel that they “knew it all along,” that is, when they believe that an event is more predictable after it becomes known than it was before it became known. Hindsight bias embodies any combination of three aspects: memory distortion, beliefs about events’ objective likelihoods, or subjective beliefs about one’s own prediction abilities. Hindsight bias stems from (a) cognitive inputs (people selectively recall information consistent with what they now know to be… 

Figures from this paper

Looking Backward and Forward on Hindsight Bias

The same event that appeared unpredictable in foresight can be judged as predictable in hindsight. Hindsight bias clouds judgments in all areas of life, including legal decisions, medical diagnoses,

Is There Hindsight Bias Without Real Hindsight? Conjectures Are Sufficient to Elicit Hindsight Bias

Results show that conjectures had changed over time and affected participants’ reproductions of their earlier estimates, demonstrating hindsight distortions in the absence of definite knowledge.

Hindsight bias in metamemory: outcome knowledge influences the recollection of judgments of learning

It is demonstrated that people overestimate the accuracy of their memory predictions in hindsight, which produces a hindsight bias on Judgments of Learning (JOLs).

A Rational Account of Anchor Effects in Hindsight Bias

Hindsight bias is exhibited when knowledge of an outcome (i.e., an anchor) affects subsequent recollections of previous predictions (i.e., an estimate). Hindsight bias usually leads to estimates

Wikipedia outperforms individuals when it comes to hindsight bias

These findings are the first to demonstrate Wikipedia’s superiority over individuals when it comes to hindsight bias, and there was substantial support for the null hypothesis (i.e., no hindsight bias) in Wikipedia.

The Biases of Others

When social beliefs are systematically biased, understanding how people think about the biases of others is essential since biased beliefs about the beliefs of others and the anticipation of the same

Hindsight bias is not a bias

My favourite fallacy is the fallacy fallacy. It’s the fallacy of thinking that something is a fallacy when it isn’t. This paper concerns a high-profile instance, namely the phenomenon of hindsight

Pragmatic, constructive, and reconstructive memory influences on the hindsight bias.

In hindsight, when the outcome of an uncertain scenario is already known, we typically feel that this outcome was always likely; hindsight judgments of outcome probabilities exceed foresight

Older and younger adults’ hindsight bias after positive and negative outcomes

There are age differences in hindsight bias after positive and negative outcomes, but only with regard to memory for prior judgments.



Certainty and Uncertainty: The Two Faces of the Hindsight Bias

Abstract “Hindsight Bias” is a person's tendency, after learning about the actual outcome of a situation or the correct answer to a question, to distort a previous judgment in the direction of this

Hindsight bias redefined: It's about time

Not the same old hindsight bias: Outcome information distorts a broad range of retrospective judgments

Experiment 2 showed that the effects of hindsight bias were diminished when participants engaged in private thought about the upcoming questions prior to receiving outcome information, suggesting that the effect is not due to impression management concerns.

Motivational interpretations of hindsight bias: An individual difference analysis

When individuals learn the outcome of an event or the correct answer to a question, they overestimate its prior predictability: that is, they tend to believe they “knew it all along.” Cognitive and

Hindsight Bias: A Primer for Motivational Researchers

Thirty-five years since the publication of Fischhoff’s (1975) seminal article, we continue to be fascinated by the hindsight bias. Like a well-developed character in a novel, the bias has something

A Positive Psychological Theory of Judging in Hindsight

Past events frequently seem inevitable and predictable after they unfold -- a tendency that cognitive psychologists have labeled the "hindsight bias." This bias affects judgments of liability in the

Decomposing Hindsight Bias

Traditional accounts of “hindsight bias” inadequately distinguish “primary” hindsight bias from both “secondary” and “tertiary” hindsight bias. A subject exhibits primary bias when she assigns a

Hindsight bias around the world.

It is suggested that the basic cognitive processes leading to hindsight bias are by-products of the evolutionary-evolved capacity of adaptive learning, and individual meta-cognitions or motives may further moderate the amount of bias.

Increased or reversed? The effect of surprise on hindsight bias depends on the hindsight component.

  • S. NestlerB. Egloff
  • Psychology
    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
  • 2009
The present results strongly support the separate-components view of the hindsight bias, which argues that hindsight bias consists of 3 independent components: memory distortions, impressions of inevitability and impressions of foreseeability.

Hindsight bias doesn't always come easy: causal models, cognitive effort, and creeping determinism.

It is proposed, on the basis of a causal-model theory of creeping determinism, that the underlying processes are effortful, and hence creeping determinists should disappear when individuals lack the cognitive resources to make sense of an outcome.