Hindsight Bias

  title={Hindsight Bias},
  author={Neal J. Roese and Kathleen D. Vohs},
  journal={Perspectives on Psychological Science},
  pages={411 - 426}
  • N. Roese, K. Vohs
  • Published 1 September 2012
  • Medicine
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science
Hindsight bias occurs when people feel that they “knew it all along,” that is, when they believe that an event is more predictable after it becomes known than it was before it became known. Hindsight bias embodies any combination of three aspects: memory distortion, beliefs about events’ objective likelihoods, or subjective beliefs about one’s own prediction abilities. Hindsight bias stems from (a) cognitive inputs (people selectively recall information consistent with what they now know to be… 
Taking a naïve other's perspective to debias the hindsight bias: Did it backfire?
Abstract Hindsight bias is a phenomenon that occurs when outcome knowledge interferes with the ability to accurately recall judgments made in a previous, naive state. Also known as the “knew it all
Looking Backward and Forward on Hindsight Bias
The same event that appeared unpredictable in foresight can be judged as predictable in hindsight. Hindsight bias clouds judgments in all areas of life, including legal decisions, medical diagnoses,
Is There Hindsight Bias Without Real Hindsight? Conjectures Are Sufficient to Elicit Hindsight Bias
Results show that conjectures had changed over time and affected participants’ reproductions of their earlier estimates, demonstrating hindsight distortions in the absence of definite knowledge.
A Rational Account of Anchor Effects in Hindsight Bias
Hindsight bias is exhibited when knowledge of an outcome (i.e., an anchor) affects subsequent recollections of previous predictions (i.e., an estimate). Hindsight bias usually leads to estimates
Hindsight bias in metamemory: outcome knowledge influences the recollection of judgments of learning
It is demonstrated that people overestimate the accuracy of their memory predictions in hindsight, which produces a hindsight bias on Judgments of Learning (JOLs).
Wikipedia outperforms individuals when it comes to hindsight bias
These findings are the first to demonstrate Wikipedia’s superiority over individuals when it comes to hindsight bias, and there was substantial support for the null hypothesis (i.e., no hindsight bias) in Wikipedia.
The Biases of Others
When social beliefs are systematically biased, understanding how people think about the biases of others is essential since biased beliefs about the beliefs of others and the anticipation of the same
Hindsight bias is not a bias
My favourite fallacy is the fallacy fallacy. It’s the fallacy of thinking that something is a fallacy when it isn’t. This paper concerns a high-profile instance, namely the phenomenon of hindsight
Hindsight Bias in Judgements of Dating Couples
Hindsight bias, also known as the “I knew it all along” effect, exaggerates our ability to understand our initial perceptions and predictions after something has already occurred. Although hindsight
Older and younger adults' hindsight bias after positive and negative outcomes.
There are age differences in hindsight bias after positive and negative outcomes, but only with regard to memory for prior judgments.


Certainty and Uncertainty: The Two Faces of the Hindsight Bias
Abstract “Hindsight Bias” is a person's tendency, after learning about the actual outcome of a situation or the correct answer to a question, to distort a previous judgment in the direction of this
Hindsight and Causality
When people know how an event turned out, they are usually unable to reproduce the judgments they would have made without outcome knowledge. Furthermore, they are unaware of their inability to
Hindsight bias redefined: It's about time
Four experiments introduced a new conceptual and methodological approach to hindsight bias, traditionally defined as the tendency to exaggerate the a priori predictability of outcomes after they
Not the same old hindsight bias: Outcome information distorts a broad range of retrospective judgments
Experiment 2 showed that the effects of hindsight bias were diminished when participants engaged in private thought about the upcoming questions prior to receiving outcome information, suggesting that the effect is not due to impression management concerns.
Motivational interpretations of hindsight bias: An individual difference analysis
When individuals learn the outcome of an event or the correct answer to a question, they overestimate its prior predictability: that is, they tend to believe they “knew it all along.” Cognitive and
Hindsight Bias: A Primer for Motivational Researchers
Thirty-five years since the publication of Fischhoff’s (1975) seminal article, we continue to be fascinated by the hindsight bias. Like a well-developed character in a novel, the bias has something
A Positive Psychological Theory of Judging in Hindsight
Past events frequently seem inevitable and predictable after they unfold -- a tendency that cognitive psychologists have labeled the "hindsight bias." This bias affects judgments of liability in the
Decomposing Hindsight Bias
Traditional accounts of “hindsight bias” inadequately distinguish “primary” hindsight bias from both “secondary” and “tertiary” hindsight bias. A subject exhibits primary bias when she assigns a
Hindsight bias around the world.
It is suggested that the basic cognitive processes leading to hindsight bias are by-products of the evolutionary-evolved capacity of adaptive learning, and individual meta-cognitions or motives may further moderate the amount of bias.
Increased or reversed? The effect of surprise on hindsight bias depends on the hindsight component.
  • S. Nestler, B. Egloff
  • Psychology, Medicine
    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
  • 2009
The present results strongly support the separate-components view of the hindsight bias, which argues that hindsight bias consists of 3 independent components: memory distortions, impressions of inevitability and impressions of foreseeability.