High-flow humidified nasal oxygenation vs. standard face mask oxygenation.

@article{Pillai2016HighflowHN,
  title={High-flow humidified nasal oxygenation vs. standard face mask oxygenation.},
  author={Avinesh Pillai and Veena Daga and Jf Lewis and Mohamed Ibrahim Mahmoud and Mary C Mushambi and David G Bogod},
  journal={Anaesthesia},
  year={2016},
  volume={71 11},
  pages={
          1280-1283
        }
}
Ten healthy volunteers received oxygen for 1 min, 2 min and 3 min at 10 l.min-1 via a face mask, or humidified oxygen at 60 l.min-1 via nasal prongs (OptiflowTM ) with the mouth closed and with the mouth open. The mean (SD) end-tidal oxygen partial pressure after 3 min face mask and Optiflow oxygenation, with mouth closed and open, were: 88.5 (6.2) kPa; 85.6 (6.4) kPa and 48.7 (26.4) kPa, respectively, p = 0.001. The equivalent mean (SD) transcutaneous oxygen partial pressures were: 34.6 (5.4… CONTINUE READING

Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 14 REFERENCES

High-flow nasal cannula oxygen during endotracheal intubation in hypoxemic patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Mickaël Vourc’h, Pierre Asfar, +13 authors Christophe Guitton
  • Intensive Care Medicine
  • 2015
VIEW 1 EXCERPT

Spot check analysis of gas exchange: invasive versus noninvasive methods.

  • Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases
  • 2015
VIEW 2 EXCERPTS