Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces

@inproceedings{Nielsen1990HeuristicEO,
  title={Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces},
  author={Jakob Nielsen and Rolf Molich},
  booktitle={CHI '90},
  year={1990}
}
Heuristic evaluation is an informal method of usability analysis where a number of evaluators are presented with an interface design and asked to comment on it. Four experiments showed that individual evaluators were mostly quite bad at doing such heuristic evaluations and that they only found between 20 and 51% of the usability problems in the interfaces they evaluated. On the other hand, we could aggregate the evaluations from several evaluators to a single evaluation and such aggregates do… Expand
User interface evaluation in the real world: a comparison of four techniques
TLDR
A user interface for a software product was evaluated prior to its release by four groups, each applying a different technique: heuristic evaluation, software guidelines, cognitive walkthroughs, and usability testing. Expand
Novice heuristic evaluations of a complex interface
TLDR
The ability of evaluators with limited experience to use Heuristic Evaluation (HE) in assessing a complex interface is described and modification to HE is suggested to most efficiently produce a complete set of usability problems in an interface. Expand
Paper 2: the Reliability of Usability Evaluation Methods Reliability of Usability Evaluation Methods Heuristic Evaluations
As one of their “three measures for examining an evaluation method,” Hartson, et al. describe reliability as a measure whereby “results [are] consistent...[and]... independent of the individualExpand
A methodology to develop usability / user experience heuristics
TLDR
This research aims to formalize a methodology for developing usability heuristics, which can be used in the development of different software products. Expand
Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation
Usability specialists were better than non-specialists at performing heuristic evaluation, and “double experts” with specific expertise in the kind of interface being evaluated performed even better.Expand
EMPIRICISM VERSUS JUDGEMENT: COMPARING USER INTERFACE EVALUATION METHODS ON A NEW TELEPHONE-BASED INTERFACE
TLDR
The current study attempts to test the heuristic method of evaluation under several conditions and user interface (UI) experts' "best guess" predictions, for comparing to laboratory performance testing results. Expand
Mobile Application Usability: Heuristic Evaluation and Evaluation of Heuristics
TLDR
This work empirically evaluate three sets of usability heuristics for use with mobile applications, including a set defined by the authors, which surface more usability issues in a mobile application than other sets ofHeuristics. Expand
Usability testing vs. heuristic evaluation: was there a contest?
TLDR
The authors of studies that compared inspection methods to usability testing point out the rather severe limitations to using inspection methods as a substitute for usability testing and argue for a more balanced repertoire of usability assessment techniques. Expand
Usability Inspection Methods
TLDR
This chapter presents the variety of techniques that fall under the umbrella term of usability inspection, and presents the considerations for the practitioners considering using one of these techniques. Expand
Experimental Evaluation of Usability Heuristics
TLDR
An empirical analysis about how the Nielsen's usability heuristics are perceived by novice evaluators is presented, finding that all the above mentioned constructs have an influence in the intention to use the heuristic in future usability evaluations, excepting the perceived clarity. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 11 REFERENCES
Teaching user interface design based on usability engineering
TLDR
The use of mandatory laboratory assignments is discussed in more detail and results from studies of students' motivation for taking the usability course and their evaluation of different aspects of the course are presented. Expand
Guidelines for Designing User Interface Software
TLDR
These design guidelines cover six functional areas: data entry, data display, sequence control, user guidance, data transmission, and data protection. Expand
Classification of dialog techniques
TLDR
The CHI+GI'87 workshop on classification of dialog techniques was intended to remedy the problem somewhat by coming up with a classification scheme according to which existing and new dialog techniques could be cataloged. Expand
Improving a human-computer dialogue
A survey of seventy-seven highly motivated industrial designers and programmers indicates that the identification of specific, potential problems in a human-computer dialogue design is difficult.
A basis for scaling qualitative data.
IN A GREAT deal of research in the social and psychological sciences, interest lies in certain large classes of qualitative observations. For example, research in marriage is concerned with a classExpand
The Prospects for Psychological Science in Human-Computer Interaction
TLDR
The prospects of psychology playing a significant role in the progress of human-computer interaction are discussed and the prospects for overcoming each of these obstacles are analyzed. Expand
Assessing the learnability of HyperCard as a programming language. Manuscript submitted for publication
  • Assessing the learnability of HyperCard as a programming language. Manuscript submitted for publication
  • 1990
Bused Systems
  • Bused Systems
Assessing the learnability of HyperCard as a programming language
    ...
    1
    2
    ...