Heterogeneity and peer effects in mutual fund proxy voting $

@inproceedings{Matvos2010HeterogeneityAP,
  title={Heterogeneity and peer effects in mutual fund proxy voting \$},
  author={Gregor Matvos and Michael Ostrovsky},
  year={2010}
}
This paper studies voting in corporate director elections. We construct a comprehensive data set of 2,058,788 mutual fund votes over a two-year period. We find systematic heterogeneity in voting: some funds are consistently more management-friendly than others. We also establish the presence of peer effects: a fund is more likely to oppose management when other funds are more likely to oppose it, all else being equal. We estimate a voting model whose supermodular structure allows us to compute… CONTINUE READING
Highly Cited
This paper has 21 citations. REVIEW CITATIONS

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 24 references

Control Function and Related Methods

G. Imbens, J. Wooldridge
NBER Summer Institute Lecture Notes. Available at /http://www • 2007
View 3 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Electing Directors

Jie Cai, Jacqueline L. Garner, Ralph A. Walkling
2007
View 3 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Desegregation and the achievement gap: Do diverse peers help? Unpublished working paper. University of Wisconsin, Madison

J. Cooley
2010
View 3 Excerpts

Mutual funds and proxy voting : new evidence on corporate governance

B. Sacerdote
Journal of Business and Technology Law • 2006

Mutual funds and proxy voting: new

B. Rothberg, S. Lilien
2006
View 1 Excerpt

Majority voting in director elections : from the symbolic to the democratic

U. Malmendier, G. Tate
2005

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…