• Corpus ID: 226299815

Heavy-tailed distribution of the number of publications within scientific journals

@article{Delabays2020HeavytailedDO,
  title={Heavy-tailed distribution of the number of publications within scientific journals},
  author={Robin Delabays and Melvyn Tyloo},
  journal={ArXiv},
  year={2020},
  volume={abs/2011.05703}
}
The community of scientists is characterized by their need to publish in peer-reviewed journals, in an attempt to avoid the "perish" side of the famous maxim. Accordingly, almost all researchers authored some scientific articles. Scholarly publications represent at least two benefits for the study of the scientific community as a social group. First, they attest of some form of relation between scientists (collaborations, mentoring, heritage,...), useful to determine and analyze social… 
View PDF on arXiv
View With Semantic Reader

Figures and Tables from this paper

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 40 REFERENCES
Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references
TLDR
This study looked at the rate at which science has grown since the mid‐1600s and identified three essential growth phases: from less than 1% up to the middle of the 18th century, to 2 to 3%up to the period between the two world wars, and 8 to 9% to 2010.
Attention decay in science
A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes
  • D. Price
  • Mathematics
    J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci.
  • 1976
TLDR
It is shown that such a stochastic law is governed by the Beta Function, containing only one free parameter, and this is approximated by a skew or hyperbolic distribution of the type that is widespread in bibliometrics and diverse social science phenomena.
Three dimensions of scientific impact
TLDR
A model that can accurately recreate a citation record based on just three parameters: the number of publications, the total number of citations, and the degree of randomness in the citation patterns is crafted.
Science of science
TLDR
SciSci has revealed choices and trade-offs that scientists face as they advance both their own careers and the scientific horizon, and offers a deep quantitative understanding of the relational structure between scientists, institutions, and ideas, which facilitates the identification of fundamental mechanisms responsible for scientific discovery.
Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations
Characterizing and Modeling Citation Dynamics
TLDR
This work investigates bibliometric data of papers published in journals of the American Physical Society, searching for the type of function which best describes the observed citation distributions, and proposes a linear preferential attachment with time dependent initial attractiveness which successfully reproduces the empirical citation distributions.
The structure of scientific collaboration networks.
  • M. Newman
  • Physics
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
  • 2001
TLDR
It is shown that these collaboration networks form "small worlds," in which randomly chosen pairs of scientists are typically separated by only a short path of intermediate acquaintances.
Scale-free networks are rare
TLDR
A severe test of their empirical prevalence using state-of-the-art statistical tools applied to nearly 1000 social, biological, technological, transportation, and information networks finds robust evidence that strongly scale-free structure is empirically rare, while for most networks, log-normal distributions fit the data as well or better than power laws.
Universality of citation distributions revisited
TLDR
A large-scale validation study of Radicchi, Fortunato, and Castellano's (2008) universality-of-citation-distributions claim shows that claiming citation distributions to be universal for all fields of science is not warranted.
...
1
2
3
4
...