Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials.
@article{Anglemyer2014HealthcareOA, title={Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials.}, author={A. Anglemyer and Hacsi Horvath and L. Bero}, journal={The Cochrane database of systematic reviews}, year={2014}, volume={4}, pages={ MR000034 } }
BACKGROUND
Researchers and organizations often use evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the efficacy of a treatment or intervention under ideal conditions. Studies of observational designs are often used to measure the effectiveness of an intervention in 'real world' scenarios. Numerous study designs and modifications of existing designs, including both randomized and observational, are used for comparative effectiveness research in an attempt to give an unbiased… CONTINUE READING
Paper Mentions
Observational Clinical Trial
BACKGROUND Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) typically occur in elderly people and with time, a
portion of the patients evolve into acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Therefore a risk-adapted… Expand
Conditions | MDS (Myelodysplastic Syndrome) |
---|
315 Citations
Diverse criteria and methods are used to compare treatment effect estimates: a scoping review.
- Medicine
- Journal of clinical epidemiology
- 2016
- 1
The Range and Scientific Value of Randomized Trials.
- Medicine
- Deutsches Arzteblatt international
- 2017
- 14
- PDF
Agreement of treatment effects for mortality from routinely collected data and subsequent randomized trials: meta-epidemiological survey
- Medicine
- British Medical Journal
- 2016
- 105
- PDF
Non-randomized studies using causal-modelling may give different answers than RCTs: a meta-epidemiological study.
- Medicine
- Journal of clinical epidemiology
- 2019
- 3
Benchmarking Observational Analyses Against Randomized Trials: a Review of Studies Assessing Propensity Score Methods
- Medicine
- Journal of General Internal Medicine
- 2020
- 1
Pharmacoepidemiology: Using randomised control trials and observational studies in clinical decision‐making
- Medicine
- British journal of clinical pharmacology
- 2019
- 1
Combining randomized and non-randomized evidence in network meta-analysis.
- Medicine
- Statistics in medicine
- 2017
- 50
- PDF
Clinical Knowledge from Observational Studies. Everything You Wanted to Know but Were Afraid to Ask
- Medicine
- American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine
- 2018
- 21
A protocol for a systematic review of non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention to randomised controlled trials
- Medicine
- Systematic Reviews
- 2018
- 8
- Highly Influenced
References
SHOWING 1-10 OF 69 REFERENCES
Do observational studies using propensity score methods agree with randomized trials? A systematic comparison of studies on acute coronary syndromes.
- Medicine
- European heart journal
- 2012
- 133
- PDF
Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs.
- Medicine
- The New England journal of medicine
- 2000
- 3,042
A systematic review of comparisons of effect sizes derived from randomised and non-randomised studies.
- Medicine
- Health technology assessment
- 2000
- 290
- PDF
A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials
- Medicine
- American journal of ophthalmology
- 2000
- 1,408
Comparison of Treatment Effect Estimates From Prospective Nonrandomized Studies With Propensity Score Analysis and Randomized Controlled Trials of Surgical Procedures
- Medicine
- Annals of surgery
- 2014
- 138
Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studies
- Medicine
- Canadian Medical Association Journal
- 2006
- 232
- PDF
Comparison of Effects in Randomized Controlled Trials With Observational Studies in Digestive Surgery
- Medicine
- Annals of surgery
- 2006
- 60
- PDF
Comparison of evidence of treatment effects in randomized and nonrandomized studies.
- Medicine
- JAMA
- 2001
- 713
- PDF
Meta-analytic comparison of randomized and nonrandomized studies of breast cancer surgery.
- Medicine
- Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie
- 2012
- 14
- PDF