Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review

  title={Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review},
  author={Kapil Chalil Madathil and A. Joy Rivera-Rodriguez and Joel S. Greenstein and Anand K. Gramopadhye},
  journal={Health Informatics Journal},
  pages={173 - 194}
This article reviews the peer-reviewed literature addressing the healthcare information available on YouTube. [] Key Result This review recognizes the need to design interventions to enable consumers to critically assimilate the information posted on YouTube with more authoritative information sources to make effective healthcare decisions.

Figures from this paper

Is YouTube a reliable source of health-related information? A systematic review

YouTube is not a reliable source of medical and health-related information and should improve its ranking and recommender system to promote higher-quality content.

YouTube videos as health decision aids for the public: An integrative review.

It is demonstrated that the majority of health-related YouTube videos lack validity, but evidence-based videos do exist and have the potential to be an effective instrument in supporting the public in making health decisions.

YoutubeTM Content Analysis as a Means of Information in Oral Medicine: A Systematic Review of the Literature

YoutubeTM represents a dynamic device capable of easy and rapid dissemination of medical-scientific content, but the most of information collected in the literature shows a lack of adequate knowledge and the need to utilize a peer-reviewing tool in order to avoid the spreading of misleading and dangerous content.

YouTube as a source of information on gout: a quality analysis

It is demonstrated that the majority of YouTube videos on gout provide useful information, however, physicians should be aware of the limited nature of YouTube and correct any misinformation during face-to-face meetings and should consider avoiding misleading videos using validity scales such as modified DISCERN and GQS.

Lack of standards in evaluating YouTube health videos

This paper is a systematised literature review of YouTube research in health with the aim of identify the different keyword search strategies, retrieval strategies and scoring systems to assess video

YouTube information about diabetes and oral healthcare

Overall quality scores showed statistically significant differences between those containing useful information and those with misleading information and personal experience and the quality of the videos recorded by dental professionals and Universities showed a higher quality.

YouTube Videos as a Source of Information on Colorectal Cancer: What Do Our Patients Learn?

There is a need for more authoritative and comprehensive videos easily identifiable by the patients that can influence patient decision-making, notably regarding screening and prevention on YouTube.

YouTube as a Source of Information and Education on Hysterectomy

YouTube is currently not an appropriate source for patients to gain information on hysterectomy and physicians should be aware of the limitations and provide up-to-date and peer-reviewed content on the website.

Does YouTube provide high quality information? Assessment of secukinumab videos

Assessment of the quality of the most viewed secukinumab videos on YouTube found no significant difference between the high, intermediate, and low quality groups, but patients should consider the importance of sources when obtaining online health-related information.



YouTube as a source of information on immunization: a content analysis.

The video ratings and view counts suggest the presence of a community of YouTube users critical of immunization, and the scientific claims made by the videos were classified as substantiated or unsubstantiated/contradicts.

YouTube, dentistry, and dental education.

The videos classified under Education have a higher degree of usefulness and informational value for laypersons, dental students, and dental professionals than those found in a broader search category.

Informational value and bias of videos related to orthodontics screened on a video-sharing Web site.

In the light of the very large number of people using the Internet as their primary source of information, orthodontists should recognize the importance of YouTube and similar social media Web sites in the opinion-forming process, especially in the case of adolescents.

Human papillomavirus vaccination coverage on YouTube.

YouTube for Information on Rheumatoid Arthritis — A Wakeup Call?

YouTube is a source of information on RA, of variable quality, with wide viewership and potential to influence patients’ knowledge and behavior, and Physicians and professional organizations should be aware of and embrace this evolving technology to raise awareness about RA, and empower patients to discriminate useful from misleading information.

Social Media in Health — What are the Safety Concerns for Health Consumers?

A range of safety concerns for consumers in social media, with a case study on YouTube, is presented and a scan of abstracts on ‘quality criteria’ related to YouTube found five areas regarding the safety of YouTube for consumers.

Videos on Rhabdomyosarcoma on YouTube: an Example of the Availability of Information on Pediatric Tumors on the Web

The observations indicate that video-sharing sites have become tools that make it easier for patients to describe their impressions and experiences of the disease, and this could help other patients devise strategies for coping with the disease.