Health research priority setting in selected high income countries: a narrative review of methods used and recommendations for future practice

@article{Bryant2014HealthRP,
  title={Health research priority setting in selected high income countries: a narrative review of methods used and recommendations for future practice},
  author={Jamie Bryant and Rob Sanson-Fisher and Justin Walsh and Jessica Stewart},
  journal={Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation : C/E},
  year={2014},
  volume={12}
}
Research priority setting aims to gain consensus about areas where research effort will have wide benefits to society. While general principles for setting health research priorities have been suggested, there has been no critical review of the different approaches used. This review aims to: (i) examine methods, models and frameworks used to set health research priorities; (ii) identify barriers and facilitators to priority setting processes; and (iii) determine the outcomes of priority setting… 
Research priority setting in obesity: a systematic review
TLDR
There is a need for research priority setting studies in obesity to involve the public and to evaluate their exercises to ensure they are of high quality.
What do we know about evidence-informed priority setting processes to set population-level health-research agendas: an overview of reviews
TLDR
A draft framework of evidence-informed health priority setting is proposed that supports countries in identifying appropriate steps and methods when developing and implementing national research agendas and proposes a preliminary framework for consideration that highlights four key phases.
Using the Nine Common Themes of Good Practice checklist as a tool for evaluating the research priority setting process of a provincial research and program evaluation program
TLDR
The novel adaptation and application of the ‘Nine Common Themes of Good Practice checklist’ is demonstrated as a tool for evaluating a research priority setting exercise operating within the public health sector in Ontario, Canada.
Reporting guideline for priority setting of health research (REPRISE)
TLDR
Improved transparency in research priority setting may strengthen the acceptability and implementation of the research priorities identified, so that efforts and funding are invested in generating evidence that is of importance to all stakeholders.
Methods for Identifying Health Research Gaps, Needs, and Priorities: a Scoping Review
TLDR
A much more robust evidence base is needed to ascertain the effectiveness of methods used to identify research gaps, needs, and priorities to ensure optimal targeting of funds to meet the greatest areas of need and maximize outcomes.
An approach for setting evidence-based and stakeholder-informed research priorities in low- and middle-income countries
TLDR
The CEBHA+ approach, in particular evidence mapping, helped to formulate research questions and study protocols that would be owned by African partners, fill gaps in the evidence base, address policy and practice needs and be feasible given the existing research infrastructure and expertise.
Health research priority setting in Zambia: a stock taking of approaches conducted from 1998 to 2015
TLDR
There were gaps in the priority setting processes, stakeholder engagement and application of a defined criterion, and there is a need for a priority setting framework coupled with local capacity developed across a range of stakeholders.
Identifying and prioritising systematic review topics with public health stakeholders: A protocol for a modified Delphi study in Switzerland to inform future research agendas
TLDR
The protocol of a priority setting study on systematic review topics in several European countries, which is conceptualised as pilot, is introduced and can be used as a framework by other systematic review groups when conducting apriority setting study in a different context.
How can we improve priority-setting for investments in health research? A case study of tuberculosis
TLDR
This study indicated two critical areas for improvement of research prioritisation processes such that inequalities in health are better addressed – the need to deprioritise some research areas to generate a specific and meaningful list for investment, and greater involvement of experts working in high disease-burden countries.
A systematic review to identify research priority setting in Black and minority ethnic health and evaluate their processes
TLDR
Research is unlikely to deliver useful findings that can support relevant research and positive change for BAME communities unless they fulfil areas of good practice such as inclusivity of key stakeholders’ input and planning for implementation of identified priorities.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 49 REFERENCES
A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice
TLDR
A checklist for health research priority setting that allows for informed choices on different approaches and outlines nine common themes of good practice is proposed, intended to provide generic assistance for planning health research prioritization processes.
Priority setting for health research: lessons from developing countries. The Working Group on Priority Setting.
TLDR
The paper proposes a strategy of priority setting, based on lessons learned from essential national health research (ENHR) approaches attempted in several developing countries, which is demand-driven, and involves multi-dimensional inputs and multiple stakeholders.
Setting and meeting priorities in Indigenous health research in Australia and its application in the Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health
TLDR
A case study of the Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health's experience in setting and meeting priorities is explored, finding involvement by both groups in project development has been found to be essential in making decisions that will lead to robust and useful research.
Setting priorities for research and development in the NHS: a case study on the interface between primary and secondary care
TLDR
A review completed in 1993 to identify research and development priorities for the NHS in relation to the interface between primary and secondary care covered several recent developments which require evaluation.
Setting priorities for research.
Using consensus methods to establish multidisciplinary perspectives on research priorities for primary care
TLDR
This paper explores how two formal consensus methods were used to facilitate multidisciplinary participation within the research arena, and the extent to which a convergence of opinion between professional groups was obtained.
Comparative effectiveness research priorities: Identifying critical gaps in evidence for clinical and health policy decision making
TLDR
This study describes an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality-funded pilot project to translate one current comparative effectiveness review into a prioritized list of evidence gaps and research questions reflecting the views of the healthcare decision makers involved in the pilot.
National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia research priority setting exercise.
TLDR
A total of 14 research priorities were identified by the exercise, two of which have been submitted to the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme as statements of research need and potential funding streams for the remaining questions are being sought.
On being a good listener: setting priorities for applied health services research.
TLDR
This article describes how the lessons learned from and the approaches to setting priorities for funding health services are translated into set priorities forfunding health services research, in which the paymasters want to use the finite human and financial resources for those areas most likely to improve health services delivery.
Consulting about priorities for the NHMRC National Breast Cancer Centre: how good is the nominal group technique
TLDR
There was a high level of agreement between workshops in priorities identified, indicating that the nominal group process can be useful in selecting priorities for action in health.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...