He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia

@article{Kittur2007HeSS,
  title={He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia},
  author={Aniket Kittur and Bongwon Suh and Bryan A. Pendleton and Ed H. Chi},
  journal={Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems},
  year={2007}
}
  • A. Kittur, B. Suh, +1 author Ed H. Chi
  • Published 29 April 2007
  • Computer Science
  • Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Wikipedia, a wiki-based encyclopedia, has become one of the most successful experiments in collaborative knowledge building on the Internet. As Wikipedia continues to grow, the potential for conflict and the need for coordination increase as well. This article examines the growth of such non-direct work and describes the development of tools to characterize conflict and coordination costs in Wikipedia. The results may inform the design of new collaborative knowledge systems. 
Wikipedia as a Distributed Problem-Solving Network
TLDR
The study focused on efforts to maintain the quality of Wikipedia entries and in particular of the use of tagging to signal the need for improvement in entries of Simple Wikipedia.
Managing conflicts between users in Wikipedia
TLDR
This article sets up a users typology according to their involvement in conflicts and their publishing and management activity in the encyclopedia, and describes users behavior in contributing to articles that are tagged by the wikipedian community as being in conflict with the official guidelines of Wikipedia, or conversely as being well featured.
Coordination and beyond: social functions of groups in open content production
TLDR
A study of the English edition of Wikipedia in which a mixed methods approach was used to understand how nested organizational structures called Wiki project support collaboration demonstrates how WikiProjects not only help Wikipedians coordinate tasks and produce articles, but also support community members and small groups of editors in important ways.
Is Wikipedia Inefficient? Modelling Effort and Participation in Wikipedia
Concerns have been raisedabout the decreased ability of Wikipedia to recruit editors and in to harness the effort of contributors to create new articles and improve existing articles. But, as Marwell
Is Wikipedia Inefficient? Modelling Effort and Participation in Wikipedia
TLDR
This paper compares the efficiency of Wikipedia projects in different languages and at different states of development to examine the decreased ability of Wikipedia to recruit editors and in to harness the effort of contributors.
Life-cycle Changes in Modes of Coordination in Wikipedia
  • 2018
We present evidence of explicit and non-explicit coordination (i.e., coordination mediated or not by discussion) in the context of Wikipedia. Using a novel approach to identifying edits to the same
"edit this page": the socio-technological infrastructure of a wikipedia article
TLDR
The social and technological features of a Wikipedia article are examined in order to understand how these features help mediate the activity of fact-building and highlights the need for communication designers to consider the goals and needs of the communities for which they design.
Project talk: coordination work and group membership in WikiProjects
TLDR
A content analysis of work-related discussions from the talk pages of 138 WikiProjects suggests that WikiProject collaboration is less structured and more open than that of many virtual teams and that Wiki project may function more like FLOSS projects than traditional groups.
Coordination in collective intelligence: the role of team structure and task interdependence
TLDR
It is hypothesized that adding editors may benefit low-coordination tasks but have negative consequences for tasks requiring a high degree of coordination, and ways to better harness the efforts of many editors in social collaborative systems involving high coordination tasks are suggested.
Beyond Wikipedia: coordination and conflict in online production groups
TLDR
The results suggest that coordination mechanismseffective for managing conflict are not always the same as those effective for managing task quality, and that designers must take into account the social benefits of coordination mechanisms in addition to their production benefits.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 37 REFERENCES
Wikipedias: collaborative web-based encyclopedias as complex networks.
TLDR
An analysis of Wikipedias in several languages as complex networks is presented, showing that many network characteristics are common to different language versions of Wikipedia, such as their degree distributions, growth, topology, reciprocity, clustering, assortativity, path lengths, and triad significance profiles.
Wikipedia as Participatory Journalism: Reliable Sources? Metrics for evaluating collaborative media as a news resource
  • A. Lih
  • Computer Science, Political Science
  • 2004
TLDR
This study examines the growth of Wikipedia and analyzes the crucial technologies and community policies that have enabled the project to prosper, and establishes a set of metrics based on established encyclopedia taxonomies and analyzed the trends in Wikipedia being used as a source.
Measuring Wikipedia
Wikipedia, an international project that uses Wiki software to collaboratively create an encyclopaedia, is becoming more and more popular. Everyone can directly edit articles and every edit is
INFORMATION QUALITY IN A COMMUNITY-BASED ENCYCLOPEDIA
TLDR
Analysis of the discussion pages and other process-oriented pages within the Wikipedia project helps in understanding how high quality is maintained in a project where anyone may participate with no prior vetting.
Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations
TLDR
This paper investigates the dynamics of Wikipedia, a prominent, thriving wiki, and focuses on the relevance of authorship, the value of community surveillance in ameliorating antisocial behavior, and how authors with competing perspectives negotiate their differences.
Assessing Information Quality of a Community-Based Encyclopedia
TLDR
This work proposes seven IQ metrics which can be evaluated automatically and test the set on a representative sample of Wikipedia content, along with a number of statistical characterizations of Wikipedia articles, their content construction, process metadata and social context.
Temporal Analysis of the Wikigraph
TLDR
This study characterize this evolution of the Wikipedia evolution in terms of users, editions and articles, and depicts the temporal evolution of several topological properties of the Wikigraph.
Issues in the design of computer support for co-authoring and commenting
TLDR
This paper reports on a project to develop a “work in preparation” editor, or PREP editor, to study co-authoring and commenting relationships and identifies three issues in designing computer support for co-authors and commenters.
Preferential attachment in the growth of social networks: the case of Wikipedia
TLDR
An analysis of the statistical properties and growth of the free on-line encyclopedia Wikipedia is presented, which can be described by local rules such as the preferential attachment mechanism, though users, who are responsible of its evolution, can act globally on the network.
Internet encyclopaedias go head to head
Jimmy Wales' Wikipedia comes close to Britannica in terms of the accuracy of its science entries, a Nature investigation finds.  UPDATE: see details of how the data were collected for this article in
...
1
2
3
4
...