Harm: Omission, Preemption, Freedom

@article{Hanna2016HarmOP,
  title={Harm: Omission, Preemption, Freedom},
  author={Nathan Hanna},
  journal={Philosophy and Phenomenological Research},
  year={2016},
  volume={93},
  pages={251-273}
}
  • Nathan Hanna
  • Published 2016
  • Economics
  • Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
CCA is an attractive account of harm. It has many virtues and many advantages over its competitors. But I won’t explore those features here. Ben Bradley gives a nice summary of them, though he ultimately rejects CCA (2012: 396–7, 401). In this paper, I’ll reply to two objections to CCA that haven’t been adequately addressed in the literature. Some critics think that certain omission and preemption cases raise obviously fatal problems for it. I’ll argue that they’re wrong. First, a caveat: CCA… Expand
Harming as making worse off
Harming by Failing to Benefit
Harming and failing to benefit: a reply to purves
The Nature of Punishment: Reply to Wringe
When Good Things Happen to Harmed People
Harm and Discrimination
Punishment, Jesters and Judges: a Response to Nathan Hanna
The preemption problem
...
1
2
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 25 REFERENCES
A Defense of The Counterfactual Comparative Account of Harm
HARM AND ITS MORAL SIGNIFICANCE
“Harm” and Mill’s Harm Principle*
Harming as Causing Harm
The Metaphysics of Harm
Can We Harm and Benefit In Creating
Accounting for the Harm of Death
Beneficence and procreation
Mill's Moral and Political Philosophy
...
1
2
3
...