Hare on Moral Weakness and the Definition of Morality

@article{Frankena1988HareOM,
  title={Hare on Moral Weakness and the Definition of Morality},
  author={William K. Frankena},
  journal={Ethics},
  year={1988},
  volume={98},
  pages={779 - 792}
}
If there is any recent moral philosopher who has wrestled with the problems of defining morality and of moral weakness in working out a system of moral theory, it is R. M. Hare. Now, in his latest book and some preceding articles, he has added to his well-known views about the meaning and logic of moral terms or concepts, and the entailed canons of moral reasoning, a doctrine of the "distinction" or "separation" of levels of moral thinking, and he is claiming that it finally puts him in a… 

Positing a difference between acts and omissions: the principle of justice, Rachels’ cases and moral weakness

This paper seeks to develop an argument defending the distinction between killing and letting die, and in relation to Rachels’ cases, the argument is that even accepting that Smith and Jones may select equally heinous options from the choices they have available to them, the fact that their choices are different is morally relevant.

Critique of intuitive reason

The author displays and reexamines Hare’s "two-level theory" of normative moral thinking ("intuitive" level and "critical" level), including goals that are intended by its establishing. Given Hare’s

A Theoretical and Critical Examination on the Relationship between Creativity and Morality

The relationship between creativity and morality is not only a key theme in creative psychology and moral psychology but also a central issue regarding individual differences in creativity. Based on

Akrasia as a character trait

Stel, je bent van oordeel dat je het beste zuinig met water kunt omgaan, maar toch blijf je telkens weer langer onder de douche staan dan je zelf goed vindt. Dan handel je akratisch, dat wil zeggen,

Ethics, Morality, Values, Principles and Beliefs