Hard and soft tissue changes following alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review

@article{MacBeth2017HardAS,
  title={Hard and soft tissue changes following alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review},
  author={Neil MacBeth and Anna Trullenque-Eriksson and Nikolaos Donos and Nikos Mardas},
  journal={Clinical Oral Implants Research},
  year={2017},
  volume={28},
  pages={982–1004}
}
OBJECTIVE Two focused questions were addressed within this systematic review. Q1) What is the effect of alveolar ridge preservation on linear and volumetric alveolar site dimensions, keratinised measurements, histological characteristics and patient-based outcomes when compared to unassisted socket healing. Q2) What is the size effect of these outcomes in three different types of intervention (guided bone regeneration, socket grafting and socket seal). MATERIALS AND METHODS An electronic… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Effect of alveolar ridge preservation interventions following tooth extraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
TLDR
The results of a pooled quantitative analysis revealed that ARP via socket grafting (ARP-SG), as compared to tooth extraction alone, prevents horizontal ridge preservation and whether there is a superior ARP or SS approach could not be determined on the basis of the selected evidence.
The Influence of Different Grafting Materials on Alveolar Ridge Preservation: a Systematic Review
TLDR
The utilization of a bone grafting material for alveolar ridge preservation reduces the resorption process occurring after tooth extraction, however, minimal differences in Resorption rate were observed between allogeneic, xenogeneic and alloplastic grafting materials.
Soft tissue dimensional changes after alveolar ridge preservation using different sealing materials: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
TLDR
NMA confirmed that the use of crosslinked collagen membranes and autogenous soft tissue grafts represented the best choices for sealing sockets during ARP in terms of minimizing post-extraction soft tissue dimensional shrinkage.
Extraction Socket Preservation with or without Membranes, Soft Tissue Influence on Post Extraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: a Systematic Review
TLDR
New trials need to be performed in order to identify what specific techniques and/or materials are better to decrease the reabsorption of the socket after tooth extraction.
Combination of bone graft and resorbable membrane for alveolar ridge preservation: A systematic review, meta‐analysis, and trial sequential analysis
TLDR
Use of bone graft covered by a resorbable membrane can decrease the rate of alveolar ridge horizontal and vertical resorption after tooth extraction and the power and reliability of the evidence is strong enough to confirm the above-mentioned findings.
Post-extraction Dimensional Changes: A Systematic Review & Meta-analysis.
TLDR
A variable amount of alveolar bone resorption occurs after unassisted socket healing depending on tooth type, as well as clinical vs radiographic measurements, location and location.
Efficacy of bone‐substitute materials use in immediate dental implant placement: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
TLDR
BSM use during immediate implant placement reduces horizontal buccal bone resorption and improves the periimplant soft-tissue esthetics, Although BSM use increases the risk of predominantly minor complications.
Comparative assessment of anterior maxillary alveolar ridge preservation with and without adjunctive use of enamel matrix derivative: a randomized clinical trial.
TLDR
ARP with the adjunctive use of EMD reduced the durations of postoperative pain and swelling following maxillary anterior teeth extraction and treatment with alveolar ridge preservation.
Alveolar ridge preservation using an open membrane approach for sockets with bone deficiency: A randomized controlled clinical trial
TLDR
ARP with a d‐PTFE membrane and freeze‐dried irradiated allogenic bone substitute reduced horizontal bone resorption in sockets with bone deficiency.
Effect of alveolar ridge preservation on clinical attachment level at adjacent teeth: A randomized clinical trial.
TLDR
Although ARP with DBBM-C revealed a trend toward CAL gain and PD reduction at adjacent teeth of extraction sites, these adjunctive benefits seem to be clinically negligible.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 79 REFERENCES
Does ridge preservation following tooth extraction improve implant treatment outcomes: a systematic review: Group 4: Therapeutic concepts & methods.
TLDR
There is limited evidence to support the clinical benefit of ARP over USH in improving implant-related outcomes despite a decrease in the need for further ridge augmentation during implant placement.
Alterations in bone quality after socket preservation with grafting materials: a systematic review.
TLDR
Based on a limited number of prospective comparative studies, the use of grafting materials for socket augmentation might change the proportion of vital bone in comparison to sockets allowed to heal without grafting.
Bone healing after tooth extraction with or without an intervention: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
TLDR
Overall the socket intervention therapies did reduce alveolar ridge dimensional changes post-extraction, but were unable to prevent resorption, which may account for some of the difference in alveolars ridge dimensions at follow up.
Surgical protocols for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. A systematic review.
TLDR
The scientific evidence does not provide clear guidelines in regards to the type of biomaterial, or surgical procedure, although a significant positive effect of the flapped surgery was observed and the potential benefit of socket preservation therapies was demonstrated.
Effectiveness of three different alveolar ridge preservation techniques: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
TLDR
The combination allograft (freeze-dried boneAllograft and demineralized freeze-d dried bone allografted) employed in this study appears to be a safe and adequate biomaterial for intraoral grafting.
Alveolar ridge preservation. A systematic review
TLDR
Post-extraction resorption of the AR might be limited, but cannot be eliminated by ARP, which at histological level does not always promote new bone formation.
A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans.
TLDR
Human re-entry studies showed horizontal bone loss of 29-63% and vertical bone Loss of 11-22% after 6 months following tooth extraction, which demonstrated rapid reductions in the first 3-6 months that was followed by gradual reductions in dimensions thereafter.
A systematic review assessing soft tissue augmentation techniques.
TLDR
APF/V is a successful treatment concept to increase the width of keratinized tissue or attached gingiva around teeth and only limited data are available favoring SCTGs over FGGs for soft tissue volume augmentation.
Ridge alterations following grafting of fresh extraction sockets in man. A randomized clinical trial.
TLDR
The placement of a xenograft in fresh extraction sockets markedly counteracted the reduction in the hard tissue component of the edentulous sites.
A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter evaluation of extraction socket preservation comparing two bovine xenografts: clinical and histologic outcomes.
TLDR
This investigation provides support for the efficacy of bovine bone xenograft for socket preservation when subsequent implant placement is planned.
...
...