Hans J. Eysenck: Introduction to centennial special issue

@article{Corr2016HansJE,
  title={Hans J. Eysenck: Introduction to centennial special issue},
  author={Philip J. Corr},
  journal={Personality and Individual Differences},
  year={2016},
  volume={103},
  pages={1-7}
}
  • P. Corr
  • Published 1 December 2016
  • Psychology
  • Personality and Individual Differences
Article history: Received 13 July 2016 Accepted 16 July 2016 all! Lastly, it would be shamefully remiss not to acknowledge the production staff at Elsevier for their support and constant hard work, and Tony Vernon, Editor-in-Chief of PAID, for guiding the special issue to fruition. Such vital behind-the-scenes work is rarely seen and all too 
The Hans Eysenck affair: Time to correct the scientific record
  • D. F. Marks
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Journal of health psychology
  • 2019
TLDR
In Open letters to King’s College London and the British Psychological Society, this editor is requesting a thorough investigation of the facts together with retraction or correction of 61 publications. Expand
A bibliometric analysis of H. J. Eysenck's research output: Clarifying controversy
Abstract We present a bibliometric analysis of a large corpus of research work by H. J. Eysenck (1916–1997), who was one of the most famous and productive psychologists of the 20th century. ItExpand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 43 REFERENCES
The centenary of a maverick
Hans J. Eysenck (1916–1997) enjoyed an extraordinary life in British psychology, much of it played out in the limelight of public attention. His fame and influence extended beyond the shores of theseExpand
What a Wonderful World It Would Be: A Reanalysis of Some of the Work of Grossarth-Maticek
(1991). What a Wonderful World It Would Be: A Reanalysis of Some of the Work of Grossarth-Maticek. Psychological Inquiry: Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 280-285.
Tales From Crvenka and Heidelberg: What About the Empirical Basis?
The sample of 1,353 people not suffering from cancer was investigated using a catalogue of 88 questions. GrossarthMaticek named this form "RGM Prospective Questionnaire" (based on his initials). AExpand
Daedalus Floating on nothing
The lightest possible filling for a balloon would be a vacuum. But how could such a balloon be made to withstand atmospheric pressure? Daedalus's answer is a graded-cell polymeric foam which is usedExpand
The 100 Most Eminent Psychologists of the 20th Century
A rank-ordered list was constructed that reports the first 99 of the 100 most eminent psychologists of the 20th century. Eminence was measured by scores on 3 quantitative variables and 3 qualitativeExpand
Systematic Reviews: Meta-analysis and its problems
TLDR
Meta-analysis may not be the one best method for studying the diversity of fields for which it has been used, and several problems arise in this work. Expand
Questions About Grossarth-Maticek's Procedures and Results
coronary disease risk: Update and critical evaluation. American Journal of Epidemiology, 123, 923-960. Powell, L. H., Friedman, M., Thoresen, C. E., Gill, J. J., & Ulmer, D. K. (1984). Can the Type AExpand
Quandaries Created by Unlikely Numbers in Some of Grossarth-Maticek's Studies
Mumford, E., Schlesinger, H. J., Glass, G. V., Patrick, C., & Cuerdon, T. (1984). A new look at evidence about reduced cost of medical utilization following metal health treatment. American JournalExpand
Social Attitude and Social Class
tT IS often said that the most interesting and fruitful investigations in | science are those carried out in fields which lie between two wellestablished Sdisciplines. While it would not perhaps beExpand
Genetics and the development of social attitudes
TLDR
A more penetrating analysis is needed of the extent to which variation in opinion and personality share a common genetic basis. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...