Haeckel and du Bois-Reymond: rival German Darwinists

@article{Finkelstein2019HaeckelAD,
  title={Haeckel and du Bois-Reymond: rival German Darwinists},
  author={Gabriel Finkelstein},
  journal={Theory in Biosciences},
  year={2019},
  volume={138},
  pages={105-112}
}
Ernst Haeckel and Emil du Bois-Reymond were the most prominent champions of Darwin in Germany. This essay compares their contributions to popularizing the theory of evolution, drawing special attention to the neglected figure of du Bois-Reymond as a spokesman for a world devoid of natural purpose. It suggests that the historiography of the German reception of Darwin’s theory needs to be reassessed in the light of du Bois-Reymond’s Lucretian outlook. 

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 61 REFERENCES
The Tragic Sense of Life: Ernst Haeckel and the Struggle over Evolutionary Thought
Prior to World War I, more people learned of evolutionary theory from the voluminous writings of Charles Darwin's foremost champion in Germany, Ernst Haeckel (1834-1919), than from any other source,
[Heinrich Georg Bronn and Origin of Species].
TLDR
Bronn's translation of the Origin of Species as well as his post-scriptum were of considerable importance for the reception of Darwin's ideas in the german-speaking world.
Major Research Traditions in Twentieth-Century Evolutionary Biology: The Relations of Germany’s Darwinism with Them
TLDR
It is argued that the Darwinian theories interacted with national research traditions such that the resulting conceptual body represented an amalgamation of a metatheoretical framework with the “purely empirical” theoretical beliefs such as the theory of natural selection.
The Road from Haeckel: The Jena Tradition in Evolutionary Morphology and the Origins of “Evo-Devo”
TLDR
How this earlier research tradition in evolutionary morphology grappled with similar questions to those now on the agenda is drawn attention, albeit from sometimes quite differentperspectives.
The So-Called Eclipse of Darwinism
TLDR
The phrase "eclipse of Darwinism" is argued here that the phrase is inappropriately and problematically employed by historians of biology and is a deterministic metaphor of darkness that establishes a discontinuous history of evolutionary theory.
DARWIN AND COPERNICUS1
  • Physics
    Nature
THE losses by death which natural science has sustained during the past year are unusually heavy. The fertile and ingenious mathematician who for more than a generation held a leading position among
The Problem of Knowledge: Philosophy, Science and History Since Hegel
"Cassirer employs his remarkable gift of lucidity to explain the major ideas and intellectual issues that emerged in the course of nineteenth century scientific and historical thinking. The
The Cambridge Companion to the "Origin of Species"
The Origin of Species by Charles Darwin is universally recognized as one of the most important science books ever written. Published in 1859, it was where Darwin argued for both the fact of evolution
The Riddle of the Universe at the Close of the Nineteenth Century
THERE is a twofold pathos in this book, for with it the author—whom to know is to love—draws, he says, “a line under his life-work,” and with it he once more illustrates the sad fact that a great
The Coming of Evolution The Story of a Great Revolution in Science
SO much has been written within the last few years about the history of evolution and its founders that the first question that arises on meeting with the title of this new work is whether it is
...
...