• Corpus ID: 40364465

HUMAN RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT IN CONTEXT

@article{Hollnagel2005HUMANRA,
  title={HUMAN RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT IN CONTEXT},
  author={Erik Hollnagel},
  journal={Nuclear Engineering and Technology},
  year={2005},
  volume={37},
  pages={159-166}
}
  • E. Hollnagel
  • Published 1 April 2005
  • Biology
  • Nuclear Engineering and Technology
Human reliability assessment (HRA) is conducted on the unspoken premise that ‘human error’ is a meaningful concept and that it can be associated with individual actions. The basis for this assumption it found in the origin of HRA, as a necessary extension of PSA to account for the impact of failures emanating from human actions. Although it was natural to model HRA on PSA, a large number of studies have shown that the premises are wrong, specifically that human and technological functions… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

An Overview on Human Error Analysis and Reliability Assessment

There is a continuous debate about the proper role of man and machine in complex operational frameworks. Formal human analyses and risk management techniques are becoming more important part to

Dynamic Human Reliability Assessment enhanced with Bayesian Networks; a Comparison with Classical Approaches

TLDR
A new methodology to assess human reliability is developed, then a comparison with another one method is drawn to observe how they behave in an ever-changing situation and a demonstration of which method is best suited to changing information is shown.

Performance shaping factors in the human error probability modification of human reliability analysis

  • Xing PanZekun Wu
  • Biology
    International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE
  • 2018
TLDR
This work reviews three major quantification strategies used in HRA methods and generalizes the modification of HEP with PSFs into a paradigm.

A Review of Cognitive Models in Human Reliability Analysis

TLDR
The significant role that the cognitive model has played in human reliability analysis (HRA) is highlighted and some directions and challenges are proposed for the future research of cognitive models applied in H RA methods based on the discussion of current cognitive models used in HRA methods.

The Role of Human Error Analysis in Occupational and Environmental Risk Assessment: A Serbian Experience

TLDR
It is concluded that PSF control remains crucial for human error reduction, and thus prevention of occupational injuries and fatalities and the case study performed at the EPCS confirmed that the SLIM is highly applicable for quantification of human errors, comprehensive, and easy to perform.

Analysis of an Operators' Performance Time and Its Application to a Human Reliability Analysis in Nuclear Power Plants

With a scarcity of empirical data, much of the input regarding a human reliability analysis (HRA) is dependent on an analysts' subjective judgment, which is one of the major causes of a high

Human Error Data Collection and Comparison with Predictions by SPAR‐H

  • P. LiuZhizhong Li
  • Engineering
    Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
  • 2014
TLDR
The empirical HEPs showed that the HEP decreased with experience and time availability levels, and the tendency of SPAR-H to produce relatively optimistic results in this study was shown.

A Study on the Revision of the TACOM Measure

It is well known that the performance of human operators, which is one of the predominant factors affecting the safety of any human-involved systems, is largely attributable to the complexity of
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 33 REFERENCES

Trends in human reliability analysis

The approach to human reliability has been changing during the past decades, partly due to the needs from probabilistic risk assessment of large scale industrial installations, partly due to a change

A data-based method for assessing and reducing human error to improve operational performance

  • J. C. Williams
  • Business
    Conference Record for 1988 IEEE Fourth Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants,
  • 1988
The author describes the development of a technique called HEART (Human Error Assessment and Reduction Technique) designed to assist engineers not only to assess the likelihood and impact of human

Safe operation as a social construct

Empirical work on organizations that manage complex, potentially hazardous technical operations with a surprisingly low rate of serious incidents shows that operational safety is more than the

Human factors and folk models

TLDR
It is proposed that one way forward for human factors is to de-emphasize the focus on inferred and uncertain states of the mind, and shift to characteristics of human performance instead, and where the model’s parameters become the basis for specifying the measurements.

Post-event human decision errors: operator action tree/time reliability correlation

This report documents an interim framework for the quantification of the probability of errors of decision on the part of nuclear power plant operators after the initiation of an accident. The

Human error and human reliability

TLDR
A short review is presented of the existing knowledge on the human error effects on the performance of system, including the design of human tasks and specific items of man operated equipment, and two examples of estimations are prepared tentatively.

An experimental study on estimating human error probability (HEP) parameters for PSA/HRA by using human model simulation.

TLDR
A laboratory experiment was conducted in order to construct a computer simulation model (human model) that describes human cognitive behaviour on detecting and diagnosing plant anomaly causes, to confirm the applicability of a human model for estimating these HEP parameters for PSA/HRA practice.

The contribution of latent human failures to the breakdown of complex systems.

  • J. Reason
  • Computer Science
    Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences
  • 1990
TLDR
This paper distinguishes between active and latent human failures and proposes a general framework for understanding the dynamics of accident causation, suggests ways in which current methods of protection may be enhanced, and concludes by discussing the unusual structural features of 'high-reliability' organizations.