• DOI:10.1111/j.1096-0031.1991.tb00035.x
• Corpus ID: 85418697

HOMOPLASY AND THE CHOICE AMONG CLADOGRAMS

@article{Goloboff1991HOMOPLASYAT,
  title={HOMOPLASY AND THE CHOICE AMONG CLADOGRAMS},
  author={Pablo A. Goloboff},
  journal={Cladistics},
  year={1991},
  volume={7}
}

• P. Goloboff
• Published 1 September 1991
• Medicine, Mathematics
• Cladistics

Abstract Cladistic data are more decisive when the possible trees differ more in tree length. When all the possible dichotomous trees have the same length, no one tree is better supported than the others, and the data are completely undecisive. From a rule for recursively generating undecisive matrices for different numbers of taxa, formulas to calculate consistency, rescaled consistency and retention indices in undecisive matrices are derived. The least decisive matrices are not the matrices with the lowest possible consistency, rescaled consistency or retention indices (on the most parsimonious trees); those statistics do not directly vary with decisiveness. Decisiveness can be measured with a newly proposed statistic, DD=S̄−S)/(S̄−S) (where S= length of the most parsimonious cladogram, S̄= mean length of all the possible cladograms for the data set and M= observed variation). For any data set, S̄ can be calculated exactly with simple formulas; it depends on the types of characters present, and not on their congruence. Despite some recent assertions to the contrary, the consistency index is an appropriate measure of homoplasy (= deviation from hierarchy). The retention index seems more appropriate for comparing the fit of different trees for the same data set.