Corpus ID: 2116515

HARKing : Hypothesizing After the Results are Known

@inproceedings{L2002HARKingH,
  title={HARKing : Hypothesizing After the Results are Known},
  author={L.},
  year={2002}
}
  • L.
  • Published 2002
This article considers a practice in scientific communication termed HARKing (Hypothesizing After the Results are Known). HARKing is defined as presenting a post hoc hypothesis (i.e., one based on or informed by one's results) in one's research report as if it were, in fact, an a priori hypotheses. Several forms of HARKing are identified and survey data are presented that suggests that at least some forms of HARKing are widely practiced and widely seen as inappropriate. I identify several… Expand

Figures and Tables from this paper

When Does HARKing Hurt? Identifying When Different Types of Undisclosed Post Hoc Hypothesizing Harm Scientific Progress
Hypothesizing after the results are known, or HARKing, occurs when researchers check their research results and then add or remove hypotheses on the basis of those results without acknowledging thisExpand
Harking, Sharking, and Tharking
In this editorial we discuss the problems associated with HARKing (Hypothesizing After Results Are Known) and draw a distinction between Sharking (Secretly HARKing in the Introduction section) andExpand
The Costs of HARKing
Kerr ([1998]) coined the term ‘HARKing’ to refer to the practice of ‘hypothesizing after the results are known’. This questionable research practice has received increased attention in recent yearsExpand
Legal HARKing: theoretical grounding in interaction research
TLDR
It is argued that a carefully constructed form of HARKing can be used systematically and transparently during exploratory research and can lead to more robust and ecologically valid theories. Expand
Forgetting What We Learned as Graduate Students: HARKing and Selective Outcome Reporting in I–O Journal Articles
With an overarching concern on how trustworthy and accurate the accumulated scientific knowledge is in industrial– organizational (I–O) psychology research, Kepes and McDaniel (2013) discuss howExpand
PsychDisclosure.org
TLDR
It is argued that the time is now for mandatory methods disclosure statements for all psychology journals, which would be an important step forward in improving the reliability of findings in psychology. Expand
The Value of Preregistration for Psychological Science: A Conceptual Analysis
For as long as data has been used to support scientific claims people have tried to selectively present data in line with what they wish to be true. In his treatise ‘On the Decline of Science inExpand
Open Peer Commentary
With the growing number of fraudulent and nonr replicability of experiments performed in laboratories world practices that investigators may be using to increase the replicability. We laud them forExpand
In Defense of HARKing
Science is a complex task. It involves the creation and dissemination of knowledge. The creation of knowledge requires identifying and abstracting patterns (i.e., identifying phenomena and theorizingExpand
New Guidelines for Null Hypothesis Significance Testing in Hypothetico-Deductive IS Research
TLDR
A balanced account of possible actions that are implementable short-term or long-term and that incentivize or penalize specific practices is developed, to promote policy change amongst journals, scholars and students with a vested interest in hypothetico-deductive information systems research. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 63 REFERENCES
HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known
  • N. Kerr
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc
  • 1998
TLDR
It is conceded that the question of whether HARKing's costs exceed its benefits is a complex one that ought to be addressed through research, open discussion, and debate. Expand
Gergen Versus the Mainstream: Are Hypotheses in Social Psychology Subject to Empirical Test?
K. J. Gergen's (1982) argument that hypotheses in social psychology are not empirical propositions is critically examined and shown to be erroneous. Nevertheless, this article demonstrates that,Expand
Under what conditions does theory obstruct research progress?
Researchers display confirmation bias when they persevere by revising procedures until obtaining a theory-predicted result. This strategy produces findings that are overgeneralized in avoidable ways,Expand
Consequences of Prejudice Against the Null Hypothesis
The consequences of prejudice against accepting the null hypothesis were examined through (a) a mathematical model intended to stimulate the research-publication process and (b) case studies ofExpand
BAYESIANISM AND SUPPORT BY NOVEL FACTS*
  • C. Howson
  • Philosophy
  • The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
  • 1984
Gardner in his [1982] assesses the ability of a number of methodological theories to explain the phenomenon, or alleged phenomenon, of the high supportive power, relative to some hypothesis, of anyExpand
Probability and Evidence
A. J. Ayer was one of the foremost analytical philosophers of the twentieth century, and was known as a brilliant and engaging speaker. In essays based on his influential Dewey Lectures, AyerExpand
For the Article Writer...How to Win Acceptances by Psychology Journals: 21 Tips for Better Writing.
The price you pay for an ill-conceived or ineptly written article submitted to a psychological journal is one of the following: (a) express-mail receipt of a one-way ticket to the Bermuda TriangleExpand
Reasons for confidence.
People are often overconfident in evaluating the correctness of their knowledge. The present studies investigated the possibility that assessment of confidence is biased by attempts to justify one'sExpand
Varieties of Confirmation Bias
Publisher Summary This chapter reviews research concerning a variety of confirmation biases and discusses what they have in common and where they differ. The overall picture is one of heterogeneous,Expand
A Contextualist Theory of Knowledge: Its Implications for Innovation and Reform in Psychological Research*
Publisher Summary This chapter discusses the contextualist epistemology as an appropriate metatheory for psychology. Contextualism's implications for reforming the process and product of psychologyExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...