Guided surgery: accuracy and efficacy.

Abstract

Different computer-assisted implant-placement procedures are currently available. These differ in software, template manufacture, guiding device, stabilization and fixation. The literature seems to indicate that one has to accept a certain inaccuracy of ±2.0 mm, which seems large initially but is clearly smaller than for nonguided surgery. A reduction of accuracy to below 0.5 mm seems extremely difficult. A common shortcoming identified in the studies included in this review is inconsistency in how clinical data and outcome variables are reported. Another limitation is the small number of comparative clinical studies. In order to find the best guiding system or the most important parameters for optimal accuracy, more randomized clinical trials are necessary. Information on cost-effectiveness and patient-centered evaluations (i.e. questionnaires and interviews) must also be included.

DOI: 10.1111/prd.12046

Cite this paper

@article{Vercruyssen2014GuidedSA, title={Guided surgery: accuracy and efficacy.}, author={Marjolein Vercruyssen and Margareta Hultin and Nele van Assche and Krister G. Svensson and Ignace Naert and Marc Quirynen}, journal={Periodontology 2000}, year={2014}, volume={66 1}, pages={228-46} }