Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic Reviews. A Product from the ESRC Methods Programme. Version 1

@inproceedings{Popay2006GuidanceOT,
  title={Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic Reviews. A Product from the ESRC Methods Programme. Version 1},
  author={Jennie Popay and Helen M Roberts and Amanda J Sowden and Mark Petticrew and Lisa Arai and Mark Rodgers and Nicky Britten},
  year={2006}
}
Titles & abstract s Titles & abstracts Include N=54 Include N=121 Include N=89 Exclude N = 0 Exclude N = 1,024 Exclude N = 21 
Systematic Reviews: Consolidating Research Evidence for EBP
The abstract should be competently written to convey what the report is about in terms of the focus, context, and the processes involved in the meta-analysis.
Using Qualitative Evidence in Decision Making for Health and Social Interventions: An Approach to Assess Confidence in Findings from Qualitative Evidence Syntheses (GRADE-CERQual)
TLDR
Simon Lewin and colleagues present a methodology for increasing transparency and confidence in qualitative research synthesis with a focus on quantitative research synthesis.
Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review
Literature reviews establish the foundation of academic inquires. However, in the planning field, we lack rigorous systematic reviews. In this article, through a systematic search on the methodology
A systematic review of the experiences of vulnerable people participating in research on sensitive topics
Objective The aim of this article is to systematically review studies that discuss the experiences of vulnerable populations participating in research on sensitive topics.
The production of quick scoping reviews and rapid evidence assessments: a how to guide
TLDR
This document is written primarily for those intending to commission and/or produce an ER in the form of Quick Scoping Reviews (QSR) or Rapid Evidence Assessments (REA), that lie between literature reviews and SRs in terms of rigour of assessment.
Systematic reviews.
TLDR
The steps that make up the systematic review process are explained and explored and both authors and readers should be familiar with the methodology used to conduct and evaluate systematic reviews.
Narrative approaches to systematic review and synthesis of evidence for international development policy and practice
Thus far, most systematic reviews commissioned to inform international development policy have focused on questions of ‘what works’, drawing on experimental and quasi-experimental studies of the
Analysis and Synthesis
TLDR
This chapter discusses strategies for data analysis including creating a data matrix and presents inductive analysis approaches to support the integration and interpretation of data from a body of literature.
Improving Conduct and Reporting of Narrative Synthesis of Quantitative Data (ICONS-Quant): protocol for a mixed methods study to develop a reporting guideline
TLDR
This study will assess how NS is implemented and reported in Cochrane systematic reviews and the findings will inform the creation of a Delphi consensus exercise by an expert panel, and develop a reporting guideline for NS of quantitative data.
Testing Methodological Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews
TLDR
The guidance framework provided a useful vehicle for structuring a narrative synthesis and increasing transparency and rigour of the process, and the framework, tools and techniques described in the guidance appear to increase the transparency and reproducibility of narrative synthesis.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 152 REFERENCES
Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Findings
A framework for synthesizing qualitative findings is described, and issues surrounding employment of this technique are discussed. Further debate on these issues is encouraged to develop and refine
Synthesizing Research: A Guide for Literature Reviews
Introduction The Problem Formulation Stage The Literature Search Stage The Data Evaluation Stage The Data Analysis Stage The Interpretation and Presentation Stage General Issues
Systematic reviews : synthesis of best evidence for health care decisions
TLDR
This book aims to increase understanding of the important role that systematic reviews play in advancing knowledge and motivate more practitiners to conduct their own systematic reviews.
Systematic reviews of interpretive research: interpretive data synthesis of processed data.
  • David Evans
  • Computer Science, Medicine
    The Australian journal of advanced nursing : a quarterly publication of the Royal Australian Nursing Federation
  • 2002
TLDR
The synthesis of qualitative data during the systematic review of interpretive research is discussed and existing methods are in need of further investigation and the validity and usefulness of the product of this synthesis examined.
Going beyond the narrative summarization of research findings: the meta-analysis approach.
TLDR
The quantitative approaches employed in meta-analysis offer many advantages as a literature review procedure and awareness of the issues it raises can improve the traditional narrative summarization approach.
Best-Evidence Synthesis: An Alternative to Meta-Analytic and Traditional Reviews
TLDR
This paper proposes an alternative to both meta-analytic and traditional reviews that combines the quantification of effect sizes and systematic study selection procedures of quantitative syntheses with the attention to individual studies and methodological and substantive issues typical of the best narrative reviews.
BEST PRACTICE IN UNDERTAKING AND REPORTING HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS
The aim of Working Group 4 has been to develop and disseminate best practice in undertaking and reporting assessments, and to identify needs for methodologic development.
Systematic Research Synthesis to Inform Policy, Practice and Democratic Debate
Issues surrounding the role and provision of evidence to inform policy and practice have become topical and problematic. The context of these controversies is discussed, with particular emphasis on
Examining Theoretical Models through Research Synthesis
  • B. Becker
  • Psychology, Medicine
    Evaluation & the health professions
  • 2001
TLDR
The author describes how to incorporate models into each stage of a review, outlining problems and limitations that may arise at each stage.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...