Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews.

@article{Peters2015GuidanceFC,
  title={Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews.},
  author={Micah D. J. Peters and Christina M. Godfrey and Hanan Khalil and Patricia A McInerney and Deborah Parker and Cassia Baldini Soares},
  journal={International journal of evidence-based healthcare},
  year={2015},
  volume={13 3},
  pages={
          141-6
        }
}
Reviews of primary research are becoming more common as evidence-based practice gains recognition as the benchmark for care, and the number of, and access to, primary research sources has grown. One of the newer review types is the 'scoping review'. In general, scoping reviews are commonly used for 'reconnaissance' - to clarify working definitions and conceptual boundaries of a topic or field. Scoping reviews are therefore particularly useful when a body of literature has not yet been… CONTINUE READING

Figures and Topics from this paper.

Explore Further: Topics Discussed in This Paper

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 160 CITATIONS

FILTER CITATIONS BY YEAR

2015
2019

CITATION STATISTICS

  • 10 Highly Influenced Citations

  • Averaged 45 Citations per year over the last 3 years

  • 7% Increase in citations per year in 2018 over 2017

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 16 REFERENCES

Research utilisation and knowledge mobilisation: a scoping review of the literature London: Department of Management, King’s

  • T Crilly, A Jashapara, E. Ferlie
  • College London;
  • 2010

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…