Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews

@article{Peters2015GuidanceFC,
  title={Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews},
  author={Micah D.J. Peters and Christina Godfrey and Hanan Khalil and Patricia McInerney and Deborah Parker and C{\'a}ssia Baldini Soares},
  journal={International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare},
  year={2015},
  volume={13},
  pages={141–146}
}
ABSTRACTReviews of primary research are becoming more common as evidence-based practice gains recognition as the benchmark for care, and the number of, and access to, primary research sources has grown. One of the newer review types is the ‘scoping review’. In general, scoping reviews are commonly used for ‘reconnaissance’ – to clarify working definitions and conceptual boundaries of a topic or field. Scoping reviews are therefore particularly useful when a body of literature has not yet been… 

Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach

TLDR
The purpose of this article is to clearly describe the differences in indications between scoping reviews and systematic reviews and to provide guidance for when a scoping review is (and is not) appropriate.

Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols

TLDR
Detailed guidance and a checklist for prospective authors to ensure that their protocols adequately inform both the conduct of the ensuing review and their readership is provided.

Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews

TLDR
The updated JBI guidance for scoping reviews includes additional guidance on several methodological issues, such as when a scoping review is (or is not) appropriate, and how to extract, analyze, and present results, and provides clarification for implications for practice and research.

Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.

TLDR
The updated JBI guidance for scoping reviews includes additional guidance on several methodological issues, such as when a scoping review is (or is not) appropriate, and how to extract, analyze, and present results, and provides clarification for implications for practice and research.

A Concise , User-friendly Guide to Conducting and Reporting Scoping Reviews in Healthcare

TLDR
An overview of when scoping reviews are indicated and how they should be conducted and reported is provided to clarify some of the common misconceptions associated with scoped reviews.

Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application

TLDR
The purpose of this paper is to provide readers with a concise source of information regarding the difference between scoped reviews and other review types, the reasons for undertaking scoping reviews, and an update on methodological guidance for the conduct and reporting of scoping Reviews.

Methods for Research Evidence Synthesis: The Scoping Review Approach.

TLDR
A scoping review was used to identify information available in the literature on contributors to loss and theft of controlled drugs in hospitals and the safeguards that have been suggested to address these diversions.

PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

TLDR
A PRISMA extension for scoping reviews was needed to provide reporting guidance for this specific type of knowledge synthesis and was developed according to published guidance by the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency of health Research) Network for the development of reporting guidelines.

Scoping reviews: the PAGER framework for improving the quality of reporting

TLDR
A structured approach to analysis and reporting of scoping reviews: the PAGER (Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence for practice and Research recommendations) framework is put forward.

A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews

TLDR
The number of scoping reviews conducted per year has steadily increased since 2012, and in particular, there is need for a guideline to standardize reporting.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 22 REFERENCES

Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework

TLDR
A framework for conducting a scoping study is outlined based on recent experiences of reviewing the literature on services for carers for people with mental health problems and it is suggested that a wider debate is called for about the role of the scoped study in relation to other types of literature reviews.

What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature.

Scoping studies: advancing the methodology

TLDR
Specific recommendations to clarify and enhance this methodology are outlined for each stage of the Arksey and O'Malley framework, to support the advancement, application and relevance of scoping studies in health research.

Asking the right questions: Scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services

TLDR
The nature of the scoping studies that have been commissioned by the SDO Programme are described; the impact of and uses made of such studies are considered; definitions for the different elements that may constitute a scoping study are provided; and the lessons learnt are described.

A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies.

TLDR
Few review types possess prescribed and explicit methodologies and many fall short of being mutually exclusive, but this typology provides a valuable reference point for those commissioning, conducting, supporting or interpreting reviews, both within health information and the wider health care domain.

A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency

TLDR
The purpose of this scoping review was to provide an overview of scoping reviews in the literature.

Short Report How to do a Scoping Exercise: Continuity of Care

TLDR
It is explained how the task of ‘scoping’ was interpreted, using some innovative methods, and some of the challenges and advantages of working in a multi-disciplinary team are discussed.

The JBI model of evidence-based healthcare.

TLDR
A developmental framework of evidence-based practice is presented that builds and expands on the work of leaders in the field ofevidence-based healthcare; is contextualised; is inclusive of diverse forms of evidence; and incorporates understandings of knowledge transfer and utilisation.

Constructing a search strategy and searching for evidence. A guide to the literature search for a systematic review.

TLDR
The major considerations surrounding search strategies are detailed and an example of a search using the PubMed platform is presented, to show nurses how to conduct a systematic review one step at a time.

Understanding and researching wellbeing: Its usage in different disciplines and potential for health research and health promotion

TLDR
Although wellbeing may indeed be extremely useful as a unifying concept for all those involved in health improvement or health research, at present it is being used unreflectively, thus potentially masking differences.