Groups Weight Outside Information Less Than Individuals Do, Although They Shouldn’t

@article{Minson2013GroupsWO,
  title={Groups Weight Outside Information Less Than Individuals Do, Although They Shouldn’t},
  author={Julia A. Minson and Jennifer S. Mueller},
  journal={Psychological Science},
  year={2013},
  volume={24},
  pages={1373 - 1374}
}
By suggesting that dyads should give less weight to outside advice than individuals should, Schultze, Mojzisch, and Schulz-Hardt (2013) raise important questions re garding whether and when collaborative judgment outperforms individual judgment. The authors argue that, normatively, the judgments of dyads should be weighted twice as heavily as those of individuals because the former are made up of two independent inputs, whereas the latter are a product of solitary contemplation. The problem… Expand
Why dyads heed advice less than individuals do
Following up on a recent debate, we examined advice taking in dyads compared to individuals in a set of three studies (total N = 303 dyads and 194 individuals). Our first aim was to test theExpand
The Contingent Wisdom of Dyads: When Discussion Enhances vs. Undermines the Accuracy of Collaborative Judgments
TLDR
The research shows that discussion can be a powerful tool for error reduction, but only when appropriately structured: Decision makers should form independent judgments to consider a wide range of possible answers, and then use discussion to eliminate extreme errors. Expand
The anchoring-bias in groups
Abstract Decision-making groups decide on many numerical issues, which makes them potentially vulnerable to cognitive anchors. In the current study we investigated (1) whether the anchoring-biasExpand

References

SHOWING 1-7 OF 7 REFERENCES
Groups Weight Outside Information Less Than Individuals Do Because They Should
TLDR
An overlooked gem is revealed in Minson and Mueller’s (2012) study, namely, an asymmetry in assessing the informational value of aggregated judgments: Whereas judges seem to be sensitive to the increased reliability of their own aggregated initial estimates, they ignore the same increased reliability when it comes to aggregated advice. Expand
A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design.
TLDR
The social information processing perspective emphasizes the effects of context and the consequences of past choices, rather than individual predispositions and rational decision-making processes, to explain job attitudes. Expand
The statistical analysis of data from small groups.
TLDR
The authors strongly urge that the analysis model of data from small-group studies should mirror the psychological processes that generate those data. Expand
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods
TLDR
This chapter discusses Hierarchical Linear Models in Applications, Applications in Organizational Research, and Applications in the Study of Individual Change Applications in Meta-Analysis and Other Cases Where Level-1 Variances are Known. Expand
The cost of collaboration: Why joint decision making exacerbates rejection
  • 2012
The cost of collaboration: Why joint decision making exacerbates rejection of outside information
  • Psychological Science
  • 2012
Using hierarchical linear modeling to analyze grouped data.