Groups Reward Individual Sacrifice: The Status Solution to the Collective Action Problem

@article{Willer2009GroupsRI,
  title={Groups Reward Individual Sacrifice: The Status Solution to the Collective Action Problem},
  author={Robb Willer},
  journal={American Sociological Review},
  year={2009},
  volume={74},
  pages={23 - 43}
}
  • Robb Willer
  • Published 1 February 2009
  • Psychology
  • American Sociological Review
One of sociology's classic puzzles is how groups motivate their members to set aside self-interest and contribute to collective action. This article presents a solution to the problem based on status as a selective incentive motivating contribution. Contributors to collective action signal their motivation to help the group and consequently earn diverse benefits from group members–in particular, higher status–and these rewards encourage greater giving to the group in the future. In Study 1… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

A status theory of collective action

Here I present a theory of collective action that emphasizes the role of status. I argue that collective action contributions earn individuals improved status by signaling their concern for the

The Dynamics of Prosocial Leadership: Power and Influence in Collective Action Groups

This paper bridges insights from theories of collective action, power, and influence to address the conditions under which group leaders solve collective action problems. We show how leaders’

The Effects of Group Status on Intragroup Behavior: Implications for Group Process and Outcome

How does the status of a group influence the behavior of individuals within the group? This dissertation aims to answer this question by investigating the psychological and behavioral implications of

Consensus and Contribution: Shared Status Hierarchies Promote Group Success

Recent research on status and group productivity has highlighted that status hierarchies encourage contributions to group efforts by rewarding contributors with enhanced status. However, that and

Democratic Competition for Rank, Cooperation, and Deception in Small Groups

Objective Stratified groups face at least two obstacles in solving collective action problems and producing public goods. Individuals face temptation to free ride, and high‐ranking group members face

Are groups more or less than the sum of their members? The moderating role of individual identification

A heuristic framework that divides formation of work or task groups into two steps is proposed, one of which emphasizes shared common identity and promotes emotional bonds, and the other takes increasingly differentiated roles that improve performance through specialization, moral responsibility, and efficiency.

Cooperative Networks: Altruism, Group Solidarity, Reciprocity, and Sanctioning in Ugandan Producer Organizations1

Results show that cooperation is induced by patterns of reciprocity that emerge through repeated interaction rather than other-regarding preferences like altruism or group solidarity.

“Take One for the Team!”: Individual Heterogeneity and the Emergence of Latent Norms in a Volunteer’s Dilemma

The tension between individual and collective interests and the provision of sanctioning mechanisms have been identified as important building blocks of a theory of norm emergence. Correspondingly,
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 108 REFERENCES

Reputation is valuable within and outside one’s own social group

It is shown experimentally that building a good reputation through cooperative behavior in a public goods situation is rewarded in future social interactions, not only within one’s own social group but also, at a similar level, in other social groups.

Collective Action, Rival Incentives, and the Emergence of Antisocial Norms

Centralized sanctions (selective incentives) and informal norms have been advanced as distinct solutions to collective action problems. This article investigates their interaction, modeling the

Pro-community altruism and social status in a Shuar village

Reciprocity theory (RT) and costly signaling theory (CST) provide different explanations for the high status of pro-community altruists, and data about status allocations to Ecuadorian Shuar pro- community altruists are analyzed in light of RT.

Nice Guys Finish First: The Competitive Altruism Hypothesis

The results of three experimental studies support the premise at the heart of competitive altruism: Individuals may behave altruistically for reputation reasons because selective benefits (associated with status) accrue to the generous.

Status Characteristics and Social Interaction

This paper discusses the small groups literature on status organizing processes in decisionmaking groups whose members differ in external status. This literature demonstrates that status

Status in Groups: The Importance of Motivation.

This paper presents evidence that members' perceived motivation towards the group is an important determinant of the influence and status they attain in task-oriented groups. Following Meeker and

Helping one's way to the top: self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom.

This behavior provides one explanation for why high self-monitors acquire elevated status among their peers--they are more attuned to status dynamics in exchange relations and adapt their behavior in ways that elicit status.

Donors to charity gain in both indirect reciprocity and political reputation

It is shown experimentally that donations made in public to a well–known relief organization resulted both in increased income and enhanced political reputation and may function as an honest signal for one's social reliability.

The evolution of prestige: freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission.

  • J. HenrichF. Gil-White
  • Psychology
    Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society
  • 2001
...