Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies.

@article{Latan1968GroupIO,
  title={Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies.},
  author={B. Latan{\'e} and J. Darley},
  journal={Journal of personality and social psychology},
  year={1968},
  volume={10 3},
  pages={
          215-21
        }
}
  • B. Latané, J. Darley
  • Published 1968
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Journal of personality and social psychology
Male undergraduates found themselves in a smoke-filling room either alone, with 2 nonreacting others, or in groups of 3. As predicted, Ss were less likely to report the smoke when in the presence of passive others (10%) or in groups of 3 (38% of groups) than when alone (75%). This result seemed to have been mediated by the way 5s interpreted the ambiguous situation; seeing other people remain passive led Ss to decide the smoke was not dangerous. 
954 Citations

Figures and Topics from this paper

The reaction to rape by American male bystanders.
  • 69
The Bystander Effect in Non-Emergency Situations: Influence of Gender and Group Size
  • 1
Bystander reactions to a violent theft: crime in Jerusalem.
  • 25
  • PDF
Do groups always inhibit individuals responses to potential emergencies?
  • 81
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-5 OF 5 REFERENCES
Bystander intervention in emergencies: diffusion of responsibility.
  • 2,214
  • PDF
Gregariousness and fear in laboratory rats
  • 156
Social and nonsocial attraction in rats.
  • 90
Behavior in Public Places
  • 1,634
The Psychology Of Affiliation
  • 1,336