• Corpus ID: 142783727

Group Process, Group Decision, Group Action

@inproceedings{Baron1992GroupPG,
  title={Group Process, Group Decision, Group Action},
  author={Robert S. Baron and Norbert L. Kerr and Norman Miller},
  year={1992}
}
Series forewordPrefaceAcknowledgementsIntroductionSocial facilitationIndividual vs group processTask motivation in groupsSocial influence and conformityExtremity in groupsSocial combination approaches to group decision makingSocial dilemmasIntergroup conflict and aggressionStress and social supportElectronic groupsConcluding thoughtsGlossaryReferencesIndex. 

Quality of decision making and group norms.

TLDR
Results suggest that thecontent of group norms is an important factor influencing the quality of group decision-making processes and that the content of groupnorm may be related to the group's proneness for groupthink.

The Effects of Extroversion on Influence in Ambiguous Group Tasks

Although the generic patterns that groups follow in reaching consensus on problem-solving tasks have been examined in detail, little attention has been given to the role of personality in group

Intragroup Decision Making in Intergroup Negotiation: Majority/Minority Effects and Hawkishness of Member Preferences

University of UtahParticipants took part in an intergroup negotiation. In the first stage participantsrecorded their individual preferences (i.e., which of several possible options theyshould strive

The most neglected moderator in group research 1

This paper argues that the group’s task is the most neglected moderator in group research. After offering a broad conception of group task, I draw on various sources to illustrate the powerful

Group performance: a confrontation of a proximate with an ultimate evaluation

In this article, two scientific approaches are conjoined: Small group research and evolutionary theory. In the past 50 years, small group researchers have identified various deficits in group

A Laboratory Study of Group Polarisation in the Team Dictator Game

This paper introduces the team dictator game to study whether social dynamics within a group can cause groups' decisions to differ systematically from individuals' decisions. In the individual

Social Influence Network Theory: A Sociological Examination of Small Group Dynamics

Part I. Introduction: 1. Group dynamics: structural social psychology 2. Formalization: attitude change in influence networks 3. Operationalization: constructs and measures 4. Assessing the model

Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: the role of personality.

TLDR
Using the five factor model with an emphasis on extraversion and conscientiousness, the authors investigated how personality is related to small group processes and outcomes in graduate students engaged in a series of creative problem-solving tasks.
...