Group Competition, Reproductive Leveling, and the Evolution of Human Altruism

@article{Bowles2006GroupCR,
  title={Group Competition, Reproductive Leveling, and the Evolution of Human Altruism},
  author={Samuel Bowles},
  journal={Science},
  year={2006},
  volume={314},
  pages={1569 - 1572}
}
  • S. Bowles
  • Published 8 December 2006
  • Psychology, Biology
  • Science
Humans behave altruistically in natural settings and experiments. A possible explanation—that groups with more altruists survive when groups compete—has long been judged untenable on empirical grounds for most species. But there have been no empirical tests of this explanation for humans. My empirical estimates show that genetic differences between early human groups are likely to have been great enough so that lethal intergroup competition could account for the evolution of altruism. Crucial… 
Purposive Social Selection and the Evolution of Human Altruism
TLDR
This article examines both positive and negative social sanctioning by human groups to show that purposive social selection at thelevel of phenotype can have parallel effects at the level of genotype, and that social control has shaped human genetic nature profoundly.
The Evolutionary Origins of Human Generosity
This article examines how altruism and self-interest are linked in human generosity, and what social scientists can learn from this linkage. The origins of generosity are explored by combining
Altruism in Forest Chimpanzees: The Case of Adoption
TLDR
Observed adoptions of orphaned youngsters by group members in Taï forest chimpanzees reveal that, under the appropriate socio-ecologic conditions, chimpanzees do care for the welfare of other unrelated group members and that altruism is more extensive in wild populations than was suggested by captive studies.
Socially Enforced Nepotism: How Norms and Reputation Can Amplify Kin Altruism
TLDR
Evaluated social norms can amplify kin altruism, giving rise to a uniquely human mode of kin-based sociality distinct from spontaneous altruism among close kin, or cooperation among non-kin.
Evolution of cooperation and altruistic punishment when retaliation is possible.
The evolution of altruism and the serial rediscovery of the role of relatedness
TLDR
An analysis of 43 evolutionary models in which altruism evolves and where the authors attribute the evolution of altruism to a pathway other than kin selection and/or deny the role of relatedness reveals that in every case the life cycle assumptions entail local reproduction and local interactions, thereby leading to interacting individuals being genetically related.
Positive effects of multiple gene control on the spread of altruism by group selection.
Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence
TLDR
This target article sketches the evidence from five domains that bear on the explanatory adequacy of cultural group selection and competing hypotheses to explain human cooperation and presents evidence, including quantitative evidence, that the answer to all of the questions is “yes” and argues that it is not clear that any extant alternative tocultural group selection can be a complete explanation.
Culture and the evolution of human cooperation
  • R. Boyd, P. Richerson
  • Psychology, Biology
    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
  • 2009
TLDR
It is argued that cultural adaptation is a key factor in the changes in human psychology that support larger, more cooperative societies that characterize modern humans.
Genetic differentiation and the evolution of cooperation in chimpanzees and humans
TLDR
Levels of between-group genetic differentiation in contemporary humans are lower than those used in previous tests, and not higher than those of chimpanzees, which suggests that the identification of other factors that differ between chimpanzees and humans may be needed to provide a compelling explanation of why humans, but not chimpanzees, display the unique features of human cooperation.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 109 REFERENCES
Altruistic punishment in humans
TLDR
It is shown experimentally that the altruistic punishment of defectors is a key motive for the explanation of cooperation, and that future study of the evolution of human cooperation should include a strong focus on explaining altruistic punished.
What is altruism?
The evolution of strong reciprocity: cooperation in heterogeneous populations.
TLDR
The agent-based simulations show that, under assumptions approximating likely human environments over the 100000 years prior to the domestication of animals and plants, the proliferation of strong reciprocators when initially rare is highly likely, and that substantial frequencies of all three behavioral types can be sustained in a population.
Group Selection and Assortative Interactions
TLDR
This work presents a series of models in which altruism is a continuously varying trait and individuals are free to choose their associates, based on information that is acquired through experience, observation, or cultural transmission, favoring the evolution of altruism and other group-level adaptations among genealogically unrelated individuals.
Altruism in viscous populations — an inclusive fitness model
  • P. Taylor
  • Biology, Economics
    Evolutionary Ecology
  • 2005
TLDR
It is shown that with an inclusive fitness model, that the same result holds in a patchstructured population, thus opposing the evolution of local altruistic behaviour.
Can altruism evolve in purely viscous populations?
TLDR
A computer simulation model of ‘pure’ population viscosity is analysed, in which offspring are always deposited close to parents and no global mixing stage exists, which generates a high coefficient of relatedness among interacting individuals.
Eusociality: origin and consequences.
In this new assessment of the empirical evidence, an alternative to the standard model is proposed: group selection is the strong binding force in eusocial evolution; individual selection, the strong
Intergroup Aggression in Chimpanzees and Humans [and Comments and Replies]
TLDR
Examination of comparative data on nonhuman primates and crosscultural study of foraging societies suggests that attacks are lethal because where there is sufficient imbalance of power their cost is trivial, and that it is resources of reproductive interest to males that determine the causes of intergroup aggression.
...
...