Great-power politics, order transition, and climate governance: insights from international relations theory

@article{Terhalle2013GreatpowerPO,
  title={Great-power politics, order transition, and climate governance: insights from international relations theory},
  author={Maximilian Terhalle and J. Depledge},
  journal={Climate Policy},
  year={2013},
  volume={13},
  pages={572 - 588}
}
  • Maximilian Terhalle, J. Depledge
  • Published 2013
  • Economics
  • Climate Policy
    • The complex politics of climate change cannot be properly understood without reference to deeper geopolitical trends in the wider international system. Chief among these is the growing resurgence of ‘great-power politics’ between China and the US, along with failures of socialization and enmeshment into global governance structures in relation to these two powers. Traditional theoretical frameworks have failed to adequately account for these developments. Nonetheless, this current great-power… CONTINUE READING
    View on Taylor & Francis
    33 Citations
    Highly Influential Citations
    1
    Background Citations
    13
    33 Citations
    Citation Type

    Citation Type

    Reflections on Global Climate Politics Post Paris: Power, Interests and Polycentricity
    • 21
    The absence of great power responsibility in global environmental politics
    • 1
    Rising Powers in Global Climate Governance: Negotiating Inside and Outside the UNFCCC
    • 3
    Advancing Comparative Climate Change Politics: Theory and Method
    • M. Purdon
    • Sociology
    • Global Environmental Politics
    • 2015
    • 54
    Enabling factors for cooperation in the climate negotiations: a comparative analysis of Copenhagen 2009 and Paris 2015
    • 6
    • PDF
    A Climate Treaty Without the US Congress: Using Executive Powers to Overcome the ‘Ratification Straitjacket’
    • 1
    • PDF
    The EU’s collective securitisation of climate change
    • 5
    One global deal from Paris 2015: Convergence and contestations on the future climate mitigation agenda
    • 5
    Minilateralism matters more? Exploring opportunities to end climate negotiations gridlock
    • 1
    Where to go from Paris? The European Union in climate geopolitics
    • 22

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 104 REFERENCES
    Hegemony, liberalism and global order: what space for would‐be great powers?
    • 382
    Legitimacy and Compliance in Transnational Governance
    • 22
    • PDF
    Can Asia lead? Power ambitions and global governance in the twenty-first century
    • 39
    • PDF
    Climate Change Governance after Bali
    • P. M. Haas
    • Political Science
    • Global Environmental Politics
    • 2008
    • 43
    • PDF
    The United States and the Discipline of International Relations: “Hegemonic Country, Hegemonic Discipline”
    • 113
    International Norm Dynamics and Political Change
    • 4,771
    • PDF
    China in Copenhagen: Reconciling the “Beijing Climate Revolution” and the “Copenhagen Climate Obstinacy”
    • B. Conrad
    • Political Science
    • The China Quarterly
    • 2012
    • 43
    • PDF
    Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work
    • 989
    Twenty Years of Institutional Liberalism
    • 61
    • PDF
    Power in global governance
    • 395