Grants Peer Review in Theory and Practice
@article{Chubin1994GrantsPR,
title={Grants Peer Review in Theory and Practice},
author={D. Chubin},
journal={Evaluation Review},
year={1994},
volume={18},
pages={20 - 30}
}Grants peer review is a family of ex ante methods used by federal agencies to select research proposalsforfunding. This article draws on Chubin and Hackett's 1990 book, Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy, to examine both the assumptions and theory underlying peer review as an evaluation methodology and the issues that arise in the operation of peer-based systems at the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The article discusses… CONTINUE READING
45 Citations
Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability.
- Psychology, Medicine
- The American psychologist
- 2008
- 221
- Highly Influenced
- PDF
Breaking the grant cycle: on the rational allocation of public resources to scientific research projects
- Political Science
- 2015
- 10
Gender differences in peer reviews of grant applications: A substantive-methodological synergy in support of the null hypothesis model
- Psychology, Computer Science
- J. Informetrics
- 2011
- 36
Exploring the degree of delegated authority for the peer review of societal impact
- Political Science
- 2018
Peer Review in the Funding of Research in Higher Education: The Australian Experience
- Psychology
- 2001
- 63
- Highly Influenced
Bias in Research Grant Evaluation Has Dire Consequences for Small Universities
- Medicine
- PloS one
- 2016
- 26
- PDF
Peer review for improving the quality of grant applications.
- Medicine
- The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
- 2007
- 99
References
SHOWING 1-10 OF 28 REFERENCES
Funding Science: The Real Defects of Peer Review and An Alternative To It
- Sociology, Political Science
- 1985
- 130
Report of the task force on the health of research. 102d Cong. 2d sess
- 1992