Governing the termination problem in solar radiation management

@article{Rabitz2018GoverningTT,
  title={Governing the termination problem in solar radiation management},
  author={Florian Rabitz},
  journal={Environmental Politics},
  year={2018},
  volume={28},
  pages={502 - 522}
}
  • F. Rabitz
  • Published 19 September 2018
  • Political Science
  • Environmental Politics
ABSTRACT Technologies for Solar Radiation Management (SRM) could limit global warming by manipulating the Earth’s radiation balance. A major objection to SRM is the termination problem: the catastrophic consequences that are likely to result from its sudden discontinuation. The termination problem limits the reversibility of policy choices and poses the risk of inadvertent or enforced program collapse. It is often considered a major impediment to the governability of SRM. In a first attempt to… 

Human Rights and Precautionary Principle: Limits to Geoengineering, SRM, and IPCC Scenarios

: Most scenarios on instruments limiting global warming in line with the 1.5 °C temperature limit of the Paris Agreement rely on overshooting the emissions threshold, thus requiring the application

Introduction to the Symposium on ‘Geoengineering: Governing Solar Radiation Management'

The term solar radiation management (SRM) describes a set of speculative technologies that might help humanity respond to climate change. SRM technologies would operate, if ever developed and

Is solar geoengineering ungovernable? A critical assessment of governance challenges identified by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

Solar radiation modification (SRM) could greatly reduce climate change and associated risks. Yet it has not been well‐received by the climate change expert community. This is evident in the

Solar geoengineering to reduce climate change: a review of governance proposals

Proposals to govern commercial actors, who could provide goods and services for solar geoengineering, focus on intellectual property policy and the review closes with suggested lines of future inquiry.

Solar geoengineering may lead to excessive cooling and high strategic uncertainty

It is confirmed that too much geoengineering can occur, leading to considerable economic losses and increased inequality, and compelling evidence of free-driving is found: global geoengineering exceeds the socially efficient level and leads to welfare losses.

An Earth System Governance Perspective on Solar Geoengineering

Abstract Solar geoengineering appears capable of reducing climate change and the associated risks. In part because it would be global in effect, the governance of solar geoengineering is a central

A Fate Worse Than Warming? Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and Global Catastrophic Risk

Injecting particles into atmosphere to reflect sunlight, stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), represents a potential technological solution to the threat of climate change. But could the cure be

Highly decentralized solar geoengineering

Highly decentralized solar geoengineering is explored, finding that this method appears technically possible, economically feasible, and potentially politically disruptive.

Climate engineering management: an emerging interdisciplinary subject

Climate engineering management (CEM) as an emerging and cross-disciplinary subject gradually draws the attention to researchers. This paper aims to focus on economic and social impacts on the

Emerging Technologies in Biodiversity Governance: Gaps and Opportunities for Action

Numerous emerging technologies have potentially far-reaching impacts on the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. Simultaneously, biodiversity increasingly serves as an input for novel

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 69 REFERENCES

Designing an International Liability Regime to Compensate Victims of Solar Radiation Management

ABSTRACT Solar radiation management (SRM) is a geoengineering method that promises to forestall the devastating impacts of climate change by cooling the atmosphere. Although SRM could avert a climate

Solar radiation management: a proposal for immediate polycentric governance

ABSTRACT The stringency of the 1.5 degree goal under the Paris Agreement, coupled with the mismatch between that goal and domestic mitigation pledges, inevitably directs attention onto the potential

On the Design of an International Governance Framework for Geoengineering

This paper explores the governance options surrounding geoengineering—the deliberate, large-scale manipulation of the Earth's climate system to counteract climate change. The authors focus solely on

Ethical and Technical Challenges in Compensating for Harm Due to Solar Radiation Management Geoengineering

As a response to climate change, geoengineering with solar radiation management (SRM) has the potential to result in unjust harm. Potentially, this injustice could be ameliorated by providing

The Security Implications of Geoengineering: Blame, Imposed Agreement and the Security of Critical Infrastructure

From a security perspective SRM is costly, ungovernable, and raises security concerns of a sufficient magnitude to make it a non-viable policy option.

The Risk of Termination Shock From Solar Geoengineering

It is concluded that some relatively simple policies could protect a solar geoengineering system against most of the plausible drivers, and should be resilient against all but the most extreme catastrophes.

Tension between reducing sea-level rise and global warming through solar-radiation management

A study finds tension between mitigating sea-level rise and reducing the rate of temperature change through solar-radiation management. The rapid warming that would occur if solar-radiation

Climate Engineering in Global Climate Governance: Implications for Participation and Linkage†

  • E. Parson
  • Environmental Science
    Transnational Environmental Law
  • 2013
Abstract The prospect of climate engineering (CE) – also known as geoengineering, referring to modification of the global environment to partly offset climate change and impacts from elevated

Governing Experimental Responses: Negative Emissions Technologies and Solar Climate Engineering

Parties to the 2015 Paris Agreement strive to ‘hold . . . the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature

Stratospheric aerosol injection research and existential risk

...