Google Scholar como herramienta para la evaluación científica.

@article{TorresSalinas2009GoogleSC,
  title={Google Scholar como herramienta para la evaluaci{\'o}n cient{\'i}fica.},
  author={D. Torres-Salinas and R. Ruiz-P{\'e}rez and Emilio Delgado L{\'o}pez-C{\'o}zar},
  journal={Profesional De La Informacion},
  year={2009},
  volume={18},
  pages={501-510}
}
Google Scholar is a search engine that specializes in scientific information and in the identification of the citations that academic papers receive, making it a strong competitor for other citations indexes. For this reason, several studies have attempted to evaluate its capacity as a bibliometric tool. Due to this interest, we present an introduction to its use and the advantages and disadvantages versus Scopus and Web of Science. First, its way of collecting information and features of its… Expand
Google scholar citations y la emergencia de nuevos actores en la evaluación de la investigación
Google scholar citations , a system aimed at researchers, attempts to outline researchers’ bibliometric profile, providing citation indicators and the h-index. We review other tools designed toExpand
Google cambia el paradigma de la métrica científica.
The spanish journals that appear in the second quartile of Google Scholar Metrics (GSM) are not listed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). There are serious differences and one big coincidenceExpand
Google Scholar Metrics: an unreliable tool for assessing scientific journals
TLDR
It is concluded that, despite Google Scholar ’s value as a source for scientific assessment, GSM is an immature product with many shortcomings, and therefore it is advised against its use for evaluation purposes. Expand
Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis
TLDR
A novel approach is introduced to check the usefulness of this database for bibliometric analysis, and especially research evaluation, instead of names of authors or institutions, a webometric analysis of academic web domains is performed. Expand
The Google scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators
TLDR
The results of an experiment undertaken to analyze Google Scholar's capacity to detect citation‐counting manipulation are shown and it is discussed how the effects of such an outburst could affect the future development of such products, at both the individual level and the journal level. Expand
Ranking by Relevance and Citation Counts, a Comparative Study: Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, WoS and Scopus
TLDR
This study analyzes and compares the relevance ranking algorithms employed by various academic platforms to identify the importance of citations received in their algorithms, and indicates that citation counts are clearly the main SEO factor in these academic search engines. Expand
Google Scholar as a source for scholarly evaluation: A bibliographic review of database errors
TLDR
The results indicate that the bibliographic corpus dedicated to errors in Google Scholar is still very limited, excessively fragmented, and diffuse; the findings have not been based on any systematic methodology or on units that are comparable to each other, so they cannot be quantified, or their impact analysed, with any precision. Expand
Received citations as a main SEO factor of Google Scholar results ranking
TLDR
The present study demonstrates more clearly than in previous research how citations are the most relevant off-page feature in the ranking of search results on Google Scholar. Expand
Altmetrics: nuevos indicadores para la comunicación científica en la Web 2.0
In this paper we review the so-called altmetrics or alternative metrics. This concept raises from the development of new indicators based on Web 2.0, for the evaluation of the research and academicExpand
H Index Scholar: el índice h de los profesores de las universidades públicas españolas en humanidades y ciencias sociales
The H-Index Scholar is a bibliometric index that measures the productivity and scientific impact of the academic production in humanities and social sciences by professors and researchers at publicExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 17 REFERENCES
Google Scholar: The New Generation of Citation Indexes
Google Scholar (http://scholar.google.com) provides a new method of locating potentially relevant articles on a given subject by identifying subsequent articles that cite a previously publishedExpand
An exploratory study of Google Scholar
TLDR
The study shows deficiencies in the coverage and up‐to‐dateness of the GS index and points out which web servers are the most important data providers for this search service and which information sources are highly represented. Expand
Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis
TLDR
It is argued that these metrics provide additional advantages over the JIF and that the free availability of GS allows for a democratization of citation analysis as it provides every academic access to citation data regardless of their institution's financial means. Expand
Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science
TLDR
The data indicate that the question of which tool provides the most complete set of citing literature may depend on the subject and publication year of a given article, and that any one of these three resources as the answer to all citation tracking needs is not identified. Expand
Putting Google Scholar to the test: a preliminary study
TLDR
Results suggest that, for scientific queries, Google Scholar has the highest precision, relative recall and Ability to Retrieve Top Ranked Pages, however, it achieved the lowest score. Expand
Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar
TLDR
Results show that Scopus significantly alters the relative ranking of those scholars that appear in the middle of the rankings and that GS stands out in its coverage of conference proceedings as well as international, non-English language journals. Expand
The pros and cons of computing the h-index using Google Scholar
  • P. Jacsó
  • Computer Science
  • Online Inf. Rev.
  • 2008
TLDR
The paper shows that effective corroboration of the h‐index and its two component indicators can be done only on persons and journals with which a researcher is intimately familiar, and shows that Corroborative tests must be done in every database for important research. Expand
Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines
TLDR
An important corollary from this study is that Google Scholar’s wider coverage of Open Access (OA) web documents is likely to give a boost to the impact of OA research and the OA movement. Expand
Comparing test searches in PubMed and Google Scholar.
  • Mary Shultz
  • Computer Science, Medicine
  • Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA
  • 2007
TLDR
This paper compares and contrasts a variety of test searches in PubMed and Google Scholar to gain a better understanding of Google Scholar's searching capabilities. Expand
As we may search : Comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases
IT may appear blasphemous to paraphrase the title of the classic article of Vannevar Bush but it may be a mitigating factor that it is done to pay tribute to another legendary scientist, EugeneExpand
...
1
2
...