Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis

@article{Harzing2008GoogleSA,
  title={Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis},
  author={Anne-Wil Harzing and Ron van der Wal},
  journal={Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics},
  year={2008},
  volume={8},
  pages={61-73}
}
Traditionally, the most commonly used source of bibliometric data is Thomson ISI Web of Knowledge, in particular the Web of Science and the Journal Citation Reports (JCR), which provide the yearly Journal Impact Factors (JIF). This paper presents an alternative source of data (Google Scholar, GS) as well as 3 alternatives to the JIF to assess journal impact (h-index, g-index and the number of citations per paper). Because of its broader range of data sources, the use of GS gen- erally results… 

Tables from this paper

“Publish or Perish” as citation metrics used to analyze scientific output in the humanities: International case studies in economics, geography, social sciences, philosophy, and history
  • A. Baneyx
  • Economics
    Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis
  • 2008
TLDR
To search for relevant publications in the Google Scholar database, the use of “Publish or Perish” and of CleanPoP, which the author developed to clean the results, are compared.
Handling self-citations using Google Scholar
TLDR
It is concluded that at the individual and research unit level, self-citations are not dismissible when calculating citation statistics, even the h-index is influenced by self- citations and comparing individuals without taking them in account can produce misleading results.
Google Scholar as a source for citation and impact analysis for a non-ISI indexed medical journal
It is difficult to determine the influence and impact of journals which are not covered by the ISI databases and Journal Citation Report. However, with the availability of databases such as MyAIS
Global Distribution of Google Scholar Citations: A Size-independent Institution-based Analysis
TLDR
This work finds the regional and country wise distribution of GS-TR Citations and tests for correlation between institutional ranks between GS TR and the other ranking schemes for the top 20 institutions.
Analysis of bibliometric indicators for individual scholars in a large data set
TLDR
This work analyzes the scientific profile of more than 30,000 researchers, and finds that the h-index of a scientist is strongly correlated with the number of citations that she/he has received so that theNumber of citations can be effectively be used as a proxy of theh-index.
Comparing source coverage, citation counts and speed of indexing in Google Scholar and Scopus
TLDR
In GS, the trade-off between data quality and indexing speed seems to be in favor of the latter, and a median Scopus indexing delay of two months compared to GS is largely though not exclusively due to missing cited references in articles in press.
Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis
TLDR
A novel approach is introduced to check the usefulness of this database for bibliometric analysis, and especially research evaluation, instead of names of authors or institutions, a webometric analysis of academic web domains is performed.
The scholarly communication of economic knowledge: a citation analysis of Google Scholar
TLDR
The results show that attributes such as the author's quality and the journal's impact factor do have important contributions to its citations, and there is statistical evidence that the number of citations of a scientific article depends on the numberof citations of the articles it cites.
Citation performance of Indonesian scholarly journals indexed in Scopus from Scopus and Google Scholar
TLDR
The results of the study identified 30 Indonesian journals that have been Scopus-indexed, of which 22 were listed in SCImago Journal Rank up to October 2017 and Journals in the engineering field were the most cited, with 2,427 citations, including 930 self-citations.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 35 REFERENCES
Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar
TLDR
Results show that Scopus significantly alters the relative ranking of those scholars that appear in the middle of the rankings and that GS stands out in its coverage of conference proceedings as well as international, non-English language journals.
The Thomson Scientific journal selection process.
  • James Testa
  • Computer Science
    International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology
  • 2006
TLDR
The journal selection process used to achieve the selection of the most important and influential journals for their inclusion in the WoS is examined, particularly with regard to citation analysis and the role of the impact factor.
Google Scholar: The New Generation of Citation Indexes
TLDR
This study compares the citation counts provided by Web of Science and Google Scholar for articles in the field of “Webometrics" and concludes that Google Scholar provides a free alternative or complement to other citation indexes.
Scientific impact quantity and quality: Analysis of two sources of bibliographic data
TLDR
This work analyzes 203 publications, collectively cited by more than 4000 other publications, and shows surprisingly good agreement between data citation counts provided by the two services, GoogleScholar and Thompson/ISI.
Citation Autobiography: An Investigation of ISI Database Coverage in Determining Author Citedness
This article presents a case study investigating the coverage completeness of the Institute for Scientific Information’s citation data for specific authors, based on analysis of this author’s
Equivalence of results from two citation analyses: Thomson ISI's Citation Index and Google's Scholar service
Citation counts were performed across a wide range of disciplines using both the Thomson ISI files and Google Scholar, and shown to lead to essentially the same results, in spite of their different
Exploring the h-index at the author and journal levels using bibliometric data of productive consumer scholars and business-related journals respectively
SummaryUsing both author-level and journal-level data, Hirsch's h-index is shown to possess substantial heuristic value in that it yields accurate results whilst requiring minimal informational
Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists
TLDR
It is shown how the h-index can be used to express the broad impact of a scholar’s research output over time in more nuanced fashion than straight citation counts.
Underrepresentation of regional ecological research output by bibliometric indices
We analyzed the articles cited in 4 reviews on various aspects of Mediterranean marine and freshwater fishes. In total, these reviews used 498 published sources, from which less than 40% were in
Ranking the International Business Journals
This study seeks to assess and rank the relative quality of 30 international business journals using both a citation analysis and a survey approach. Journal rankings are presented using both
...
...