Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia

@article{Morell2013GoodFC,
  title={Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia},
  author={Mayo Fuster Morell},
  journal={Information, Communication \& Society},
  year={2013},
  volume={16},
  pages={146 - 147}
}
  • M. F. Morell
  • Published 1 February 2013
  • Art
  • Information, Communication & Society
The image of a community shaped in a virtual environment sounded rather ‘psychedelic’ before the advent of the Internet. Rheingold (1993) proposed the term ‘virtual community’ to connote the intense feelings of camaraderie, empathy and support he observed among people in online spaces. In this field, Reagle makes a very good contribution towards undoing the image of online collective action as ‘non-real’ (an image still frequently present among scientific researchers). Furthermore, Reagle’s… 
The Social Logics of Sharing
This article explores the concept of sharing in three distinct spheres: Web 2.0, whose constitutive activity is sharing (links, photos, status updates, and so on); “sharing economies” of production
Peer production : hopes and doubts
The development of digital technology and computer networks has enabled many kinds of online collaboration. This article examines Zimuzu, a Chinese case of online peer production that produces and
On Author, Copyright and Originality: does the unified EU originality standard correspond to the digital reality in Wikipedia?
This article is contributing to the future of copyright law debate by exploring the recently harmonised originality standard in the EU copyright law and its suitability to a creative sharing
Open Research Online
TLDR
The socio-technical specificity of wikis and their application in domains of culture, knowledge and learning is described and some key tensions surrounding the properties of participation within open collaborative systems pointing to empirical research within media and communications, education as well as computer and information sciences are examined.
'Mah LOLthesis let me show u it': The (re)making and circulation of participatory culture: memes, creativity and networks
Internet memes have become ubiquitous in our everyday experiences, both online and offline, permeating a variety of fields; not only are they prevalent in our communications among friends and
Wikipedia's Success and the Rise of the Amateur-Expert
TLDR
This chapter is an examination of how a community of amateurs on Wikipedia has challenged notions of expertise in the 21st century by first looking at the roots of Wikipedia in a phenomenon known as the “wisdom of the crowds” and in the open source software movement.
Social epistemology as a new paradigm for journalism and media studies
TLDR
The lessons of social epistemology are articulated for two central nodes of knowledge-acquisition in contemporary journalism: human- mediated knowledge and technology-mediated knowledge.
Wicked Wikipedia? Communities of Practice, the Production of Knowledge and Australian Sport History
Academic responses to Wikipedia since its inception in 2001 have shifted from scepticism and hostility to serious critique. Wikipedia is a project driven by a community of amateur, and sometimes
BIRDS OF THE INTERNET
Scholarly attention to new forms of participation on the Internet has proliferated classifications and theories without providing any criteria for distinctions and diversity. Labels such as ‘peer
Commons/Commodity: Peer Production Caught in the Web of the Commercial Market
The development of digital technology and computer networks has enabled many kinds of online collaboration. This article examines Zimuzu, a Chinese case of online peer production that produces and
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-2 OF 2 REFERENCES
Cyburgs. (Book Reviews: The Virtual Community. Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier.)
From the Publisher: Praised as "one of the ten best books of the year" by Business Week, this lively and provocative look inside the development, inner workings and future of the Internet is a
Internet encyclopaedias go head to head
Jimmy Wales' Wikipedia comes close to Britannica in terms of the accuracy of its science entries, a Nature investigation finds.  UPDATE: see details of how the data were collected for this article in