Goal Ambiguity and Organizational Performance in U . S . Federal Agencies

@inproceedings{Chun2005GoalAA,
  title={Goal Ambiguity and Organizational Performance in U . S . Federal Agencies},
  author={Young H. Chun and Hal G. Rainey},
  year={2005}
}
In spite of numerous observations that government organizations have high levels of organizational goal ambiguity that exert major influences on their other characteristics, few researchers have measured goal ambiguity and tested these frequent assertions. In previous research, we developed measures of four dimensions of goal ambiguity: mission comprehension ambiguity, directive goal ambiguity, evaluative goal ambiguity, and priority goal ambiguity. Confirming hypotheses developed from the… CONTINUE READING
Highly Cited
This paper has 101 citations. REVIEW CITATIONS

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 26 extracted citations

The Impact of Socioeconomic, Organizational and Individual Factors on Government Organizational Performance: Evidence from China

2010 International Conference on Management and Service Science • 2010
View 4 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Clarity or Collaboration : Balancing Competing Aims in Bureaucratic Design

Christopher Carrigan Trachtenberg
2017
View 2 Excerpts

102 Citations

01020'10'13'16'19
Citations per Year
Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 102 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 97 references

Government performance: Why management matters

Ingraham, W Patricia, Philip Joyce, Amy Donahue, eds
2003

Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems

Scott, W. Richard.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. • 2003

Economic regulation

Salamon, M. Lester
The tools of government: A guide to the new governance, ed. Lester M. Salamon, 117–55. New York: Oxford University Press. • 2002

The politics of agency termination: Confronting the myth of agency mortality

Lewis, E. David
Journal of Politics 64 (1): 89–107. • 2002