Global mental health and neuroethics

Abstract

BACKGROUND Global mental health is a relatively new field that has focused on disparities in mental health services across different settings, and on innovative ways to provide feasible, acceptable, and effective services in poorly-resourced settings. Neuroethics, too, is a relatively new field, lying at the intersection of bioethics and neuroscience; it has studied the implications of neuroscientific findings for age-old questions in philosophy, as well as questions about the ethics of novel neuroscientific methods and interventions. DISCUSSION In this essay, we address a number of issues that lie at the intersection of these two fields: an emphasis on a naturalist and empirical position, a concern with both disease and wellness, the importance of human rights in neuropsychiatric care, and the value of social inclusion and patient empowerment. SUMMARY These different disciplines share a number of perspectives, and future dialogue between the two should be encouraged.

DOI: 10.1186/s12916-015-0274-y

Extracted Key Phrases

1 Figure or Table

Cite this paper

@inproceedings{Stein2015GlobalMH, title={Global mental health and neuroethics}, author={Dan J. Stein and James Giordano}, booktitle={BMC medicine}, year={2015} }