Global evidence of extreme intuitive moral prejudice against atheists

  title={Global evidence of extreme intuitive moral prejudice against atheists},
  author={Will M. Gervais and Dimitris Xygalatas and Ryan T McKay and Michiel van Elk and Emma E. Buchtel and Mark E. Aveyard and Sarah R Schiavone and Ilan Dar-Nimrod and Annika M. Svedholm-H{\"a}kkinen and Tapani J J Riekki and Eva Kundtov{\'a} Klocov{\'a} and Jonathan E. Ramsay and Joseph A. Bulbulia},
  journal={Nature Human Behaviour},
Mounting evidence supports long-standing claims that religions can extend cooperative networks 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 . However, religious prosociality may have a strongly parochial component5 . Moreover, aspects of religion may promote or exacerbate conflict with those outside a given religious group, promoting regional violence 10 , intergroup conflict 11 and tacit prejudice against non-believers 12,13 . Anti-atheist prejudice—a growing concern in increasingly secular societies 14 —affects… Expand

Figures and Tables from this paper

Perceived Morality and Antiatheist Prejudice: A Replication and Extension
ABSTRACT Recent evidence suggests that, although moral distrust drives antiatheist prejudice, certain types of morality are central: Perceived atheist moral capacity for caring and compassion appearsExpand
Opposition to short-term mating predicts anti-atheist prejudice
Abstract Which people are most likely to harbor prejudice toward atheists? Recent research suggests that perceptions of (non)religious individuals tend to track lifestyle (i.e., family and sexual)Expand
Is There Anything Good About Atheists? Exploring Positive and Negative Stereotypes of the Religious and Nonreligious
Negative stereotypes about atheists are widespread, robust, rooted in distrust, and linked to discrimination. Here, we examine whether social perceivers in the United States might additionally holdExpand
Analytic atheism : A cross-culturally weak and fickle phenomenon?
Religious belief is a topic of longstanding interest to psychological science, but the psychology of religious disbelief is a relative newcomer. One prominently discussed model is analytic atheism,Expand
Religious Americans Have Less Positive Attitudes Toward Science, but This Does Not Extend to Other Cultures
It is commonly claimed that science and religion are logically and psychologically at odds with one another. However, previous studies have mainly examined American samples; therefore,Expand
Belief in karma: How cultural evolution, cognition, and motivations shape belief in supernatural justice
Abstract Karma is believed to be a source of supernatural justice through which actions lead to morally congruent outcomes, within and across lifetimes. It is a central tenet of many world religionsExpand
Religion, parochialism and intuitive cooperation
Experimental analyses showed that religious parochialism involves decision conflict and concern for strong reciprocity and that deliberation promotes cooperation independent of religious group identity, similar to SCA. Expand
Is science for atheists? Perceived threat to religious cultural authority explains U.S. Christians’ distrust in secularized science
Christians’ institutional distrust in secularized science may derive largely from a perceived threat to the cultural status of religion, mediated by the belief that scientists are anti-religion, not by moral distrust toward atheists or fundamentalist religious beliefs. Expand
Violent CRED s toward Out-Groups Increase Trustworthiness: Preliminary Experimental Evidence
In the process of cultural learning, people tend to acquire mental representations and behavior from prestigious individuals over dominant ones, as prestigious individuals generously share theirExpand
Morality as Fuel for Violence? Disentangling the Role of Religion in Violent Conflict
Past research finds contradictory evidence suggesting that religion both reduces and increases violent conflict. We argue that morality is an important hub mechanism that can help us understand thisExpand


Do you believe in atheists? Distrust is central to anti-atheist prejudice.
These 6 studies are the first to systematically explore the social psychological underpinnings of anti-atheist prejudice, and converge to indicate the centrality of distrust in this phenomenon. Expand
Everything Is Permitted? People Intuitively Judge Immorality as Representative of Atheists
App intuitive moral judgments of atheists and other groups demonstrate a prevalent intuition that belief in God serves a necessary function in inhibiting immoral conduct, and may help explain persistent negative perceptions of atheists. Expand
Atheists As “Other”: Moral Boundaries and Cultural Membership in American Society
Despite the declining salience of divisions among religious groups, the boundary between believers and nonbelievers in America remains strong. This article examines the limits of Americans'Expand
Beyond Beliefs: Religions Bind Individuals Into Moral Communities
  • J. Graham, J. Haidt
  • Sociology, Medicine
  • Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc
  • 2010
The authors argue that social psychology can best contribute to scholarship on religion by being relentlessly social, and begin with a social-functionalist approach in which beliefs, rituals, and other aspects of religious practice are best understood as means of creating a moral community. Expand
The cultural evolution of prosocial religions
It is explained how a package of culturally evolved religious beliefs and practices characterized by increasingly potent, moralizing, supernatural agents, credible displays of faith, and other psychologically active elements conducive to social solidarity promoted high fertility rates and large-scale cooperation with co-religionists, often contributing to success in intergroup competition and conflict. Expand
Religion and Morality
It is argued that to make progress, the categories “religion” and “morality” must be fractionated into a set of biologically and psychologically cogent traits, revealing the cognitive foundations that shape and constrain relevant cultural variants. Expand
Moralistic gods, supernatural punishment and the expansion of human sociality
The results support the hypothesis that beliefs in moralistic, punitive and knowing gods increase impartial behaviour towards distant co-religionists, and therefore can contribute to the expansion of prosociality. Expand
How Many Atheists Are There?
One crucible for theories of religion is their ability to predict and explain the patterns of belief and disbelief. Yet, religious nonbelief is often heavily stigmatized, potentially leading manyExpand
Beliefs about God, the afterlife and morality support the role of supernatural policing in human cooperation
Reputation monitoring and the punishment of cheats are thought to be crucial to the viability and maintenance of human cooperation in large groups of non-kin. However, since the cost of policingExpand
Religion and Intergroup Conflict
Religious infusion—the extent to which religious rituals and discourse permeate the everyday activities of groups and their members—moderated the effects of two factors known to increase intergroup conflict: competition for limited resources and incompatibility of values held by potentially conflicting groups. Expand