Global differences in lung function by region (PURE): an international, community-based prospective study.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Despite the rising burden of chronic respiratory diseases, global data for lung function are not available. We investigated global variation in lung function in healthy populations by region to establish whether regional factors contribute to lung function. METHODS In an international, community-based prospective study, we enrolled individuals from communities in 17 countries between Jan 1, 2005, and Dec 31, 2009 (except for in Karnataka, India, where enrolment began on Jan 1, 2003). Trained local staff obtained data from participants with interview-based questionnaires, measured weight and height, and recorded forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) and forced vital capacity (FVC). We analysed data from participants 130-190 cm tall and aged 34-80 years who had a 5 pack-year smoking history or less, who were not affected by specified disorders and were not pregnant, and for whom we had at least two FEV₁ and FVC measurements that did not vary by more than 200 mL. We divided the countries into seven socioeconomic and geographical regions: south Asia (India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan), east Asia (China), southeast Asia (Malaysia), sub-Saharan Africa (South Africa and Zimbabwe), South America (Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Chile), the Middle East (Iran, United Arab Emirates, and Turkey), and North America or Europe (Canada, Sweden, and Poland). Data were analysed with non-linear regression to model height, age, sex, and region. FINDINGS 153,996 individuals were enrolled from 628 communities. Data from 38,517 asymptomatic, healthy non-smokers (25,614 women; 12,903 men) were analysed. For all regions, lung function increased with height non-linearly, decreased with age, and was proportionately higher in men than women. The quantitative effect of height, age, and sex on lung function differed by region. Compared with North America or Europe, FEV1 adjusted for height, age, and sex was 31·3% (95% CI 30·8-31·8%) lower in south Asia, 24·2% (23·5-24·9%) lower in southeast Asia, 12·8% (12·4-13·4%) lower in east Asia, 20·9% (19·9-22·0%) lower in sub-Saharan Africa, 5·7% (5·1-6·4%) lower in South America, and 11·2% (10·6-11·8%) lower in the Middle East. We recorded similar but larger differences in FVC. The differences were not accounted for by variation in weight, urban versus rural location, and education level between regions. INTERPRETATION Lung function differs substantially between regions of the world. These large differences are not explained by factors investigated in this study; the contribution of socioeconomic, genetic, and environmental factors and their interactions with lung function and lung health need further clarification. FUNDING Full funding sources listed at end of the paper (see Acknowledgments).

DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70164-4
0501002014201520162017
Citations per Year

96 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 96 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Duong2013GlobalDI, title={Global differences in lung function by region (PURE): an international, community-based prospective study.}, author={MyLinh Duong and Shofiqul Islam and Sumathy Rangarajan and Koon Teo and Paul M O'Byrne and Holger J Sch{\"{u}nemann and Ehimario Igumbor and Jephat Chifamba and Lisheng Liu and Wei Li and Tengku Ismail and Kiruba Shankar and Muhammad Shahid and Krishnapillai Vijayakumar and Rita Yusuf and Katarzyna Zatonska and Aytekin Oguz and Annika Rosengren and Hossain Heidari and Wael Almahmeed and Rafael Diaz and Gustavo Oliveira and Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo and Pamela Seron and Kieran Killian and Salim Yusuf}, journal={The Lancet. Respiratory medicine}, year={2013}, volume={1 8}, pages={599-609} }