Gilpinian Realism and International Relations

@article{Wohlforth2011GilpinianRA,
  title={Gilpinian Realism and International Relations},
  author={William C. Wohlforth},
  journal={International Relations},
  year={2011},
  volume={25},
  pages={499 - 511}
}
I argue that realism in particular and IR more generally erred by assigning Kenneth Waltz’s Theory of International Relations pride of place in revivifying realist thought. Had Robert Gilpin’s War and Change in World Politics been given equal billing, international relations research would have unfolded quite differently over the past three decades. Scholars would not have been bewildered by change, bewitched by the balance of power, blind to numerous potentially powerful realist theories, and… 

Considering Rationality of Realist International Relations Theories

The article refers to debates inside realism on rationality of international processes. It reveals that even a basic assumption of states calculating their interests and choosing optimal political

Liberal militarism and republican restraints on power: the problems of unaccountable interventions for American democracy

ABSTRACT The average American citizen no longer directly pays, fights or votes for war. The war on terror and the rise of debt fuelled militarism has detached the average American citizen from the

Uneven and combined development: convergence realism in communist regalia?

Abstract Leon Trotsky’s notion of ‘uneven and combined development’ (UCD) has been gaining traction as an explanatory theory of international relations over the past decade, notably in work by Justin

Status in World Politics: Status and World Order

Can the international order be modified to incorporate a greater role for rising or more assertive powers such as China, Russia, India, Brazil, and Turkey? While the rise and decline of major powers

Power, Order, and Change in World Politics: Order and change in world politics: the financial crisis and the breakdown of the US–China grand bargain

Introduction War and Change reflects in intellectual terms both the remarkable ambition and pessimistic inclination of Robert Gilpin. Although much of his academic reputation has rested on work in

Recasting Statecraft: International Relations and Strategies of Peaceful Change

Much of mainstream International Relations (IR) scholarship considers war to be a precondition for significant changes at the systemic level. Peaceful change as a subject has received limited

A reassessment of E.H. Carr and the realist tradition: Britain, German–Soviet Relations and neoclassical realism

Abstract E.H. Carr’s connection to realism has increasingly been called into question. Revisionist literature has pointed to realism’s narrow understanding of Carr and drawn from his wider body of

Recollecting a lost dialogue: Structural Realism meets neoclassical realism

  • K. Smith
  • Sociology
    International Relations
  • 2019
Since its appellation, much work has sought to consolidate neoclassical realism. Specifically, a number of variations on the neoclassical theme have reconceptualised the third-image and carved out a

Is Unipolarity Peaceful?

Unipolarity is more peaceful than what theorists predict. In causal terms, its dynamics might be less unidirectional than what is often assumed. First, contrary to Monteiro’s assumption, the

A Theory of Contestation Space in International Regimes

  • R. Odell
  • Economics
    SSRN Electronic Journal
  • 2019
In a time of uncertainty in the international order, scholars of international relations are directing increased attention to both systemic power transitions and contestation of global norms and

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 25 REFERENCES

Dueling Realisms

International relations scholars have tended to focus on realism's common features rather than exploring potential differences. Realists do share certain assumptions and are often treated as a group,

Is Anybody Still a Realist?

Realism, the oldest and most prominent theoretical paradigm in international relations, is in trouble. The problem is not lack of interest. Realism remains the primary or alternative theory in

The Tragedy of Great Power Politics

The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, sadly shattered these idyllic illusions, and John Mearsheimer's masterful new book explains why these harmonious visions remain utopian. To Mearsheimer,

Realism and the End of the Cold War

iNlodern realism began as a reaction to the breakdown of the post-World War I international order in the 1930s. The collapse of great-power cooperation after World War II helped establish it as the

The Political Economy of International Relations

After the end of World War II, the United States, by far the dominant economic and military power at that time, joined with the surviving capitalist democracies to create an unprecedented

Rationalist explanations for war

  • J. Fearon
  • Economics
    International Organization
  • 1995
Realist and other scholars commonly hold that rationally led states can and sometimes do fight when no peaceful bargains exist that both would prefer to war. Against this view, I show that under very

Theory of International Politics

Therefore, the seeker after the truth is not one who studies the writings of the ancients and, following his natural disposition, puts his trust in them, but rather the one who suspects his faith in

Toward a Scientific Understanding of International Conflict: A Personal View

A scientific understanding of international conflict is best gained by explicit theorizing, whether verbal or mathematic, grounded in axiomatic logic, from which hypotheses with empirical referents

The poverty of neorealism

Almost six years ago, E. P. Thompson fixed his critical sights across the English Channel and let fly with a lengthy polemic entitled The Poverty of Theory. Thompson's immediate target was Louis

Perpetuating U.S. Preeminence: The 1990 Deals to Bribe the Soviets Out and Move NATO In

  • M. Sarotte
  • Political Science
    International Security
  • 2010
Washington and Bonn pursued a shared strategy of perpetuating U.S. preeminence in European security after the end of the Cold War. As multilingual evidence shows, they did so primarily by shielding