• DOI:10.1177/0047117811411742
• Corpus ID: 14186199

Gilpinian Realism and International Relations

@article{Wohlforth2011GilpinianRA,
  title={Gilpinian Realism and International Relations},
  author={William C. Wohlforth},
  journal={International Relations},
  year={2011},
  volume={25},
  pages={499 - 511}
}

• William C. Wohlforth
• Published 1 December 2011
• Political Science
• International Relations

I argue that realism in particular and IR more generally erred by assigning Kenneth Waltz’s Theory of International Relations pride of place in revivifying realist thought. Had Robert Gilpin’s War and Change in World Politics been given equal billing, international relations research would have unfolded quite differently over the past three decades. Scholars would not have been bewildered by change, bewitched by the balance of power, blind to numerous potentially powerful realist theories, and bothered by endless and unproductive zero-sum debates among representatives of competing paradigms. And had all those pathologies been absent, we would be far better prepared today for the intellectual and policy challenges of a world in which underlying power balances appear to be changing quickly, and the status quo inter-state order is ever more contested.