Gideon v. Wainwright: The "Art" of Overruling

  title={Gideon v. Wainwright: The "Art" of Overruling},
  author={Jerold H. Israel},
  journal={The Supreme Court Review},
  pages={211 - 272}
Jerold H. Israel is Assistant Professor of Law, University of Michigan. 1 Four of the decisions dealt directly with the procedure in state criminal cases. See Draper v. Washington, 372 US. 487 (1963) (concerning the nature of the record that must be furnished an indigent to afford him an equal opportunity to utilize the state appellate process); Lane v. Brown, 372 US. 477 (1963) (rejecting an Indiana law requiring a public defender's approval before an indigent defendant can obtain a free… Expand
15 Citations
Implications of Gideon v. Wainwright on American Society
Your Honor, I request this Court to appoint counsel to represent me in this trial,”1 stated defendant Clearance Earl Gideon before the Judicial Circuit Court of Florida. The court replied, “Mr.Expand
Assignment of Counsel for Indigents
Provision of legal counsel for indigent defendants is one of the most important rights given to citizens of the United States. It is an essential guarantee of fair and just court proceedings. AnExpand
Confidentiality of Attorney-Client Communications in the United States
This chapter first outlines the extent of the right to counsel in criminal cases in the United States, that is, when it is first recognized, the types of cases where appointed counsel is mandatoryExpand
"Life's hurried tangled road": A therapeutic jurisprudence analysis of why dedicated counsel must be assigned to represent persons with mental disabilities in community settings.
Unless meaningful counsel is provided in such situations, the cycle of arrest, hospitalization, and stays in the community will continue for individuals with serious mental illnesses, who are among some of the most disenfranchised citizens in the nation. Expand
Criminal Justice Policy Across the United States: Due Process in the Punitive Turn
Students of criminal justice policy and politics generally agree that the past three decades have witnessed a dramatic shift toward harsh policies and practices in the United States.1 CapitalExpand
Right to Counsel
The right to counsel is the constitutional right of a criminal defendant to be represented by an attorney (lawyer) during criminal court proceedings to ensure a fair trial as set forth in the SixthExpand
Criminal Justice Process
“Criminal justice” is a multi-faceted concept with several meanings. This entry focuses on that meaning where society's reaction to crime can be examined. It goes beyond that to highlight theExpand
Political Stare Decisis
  • Oren Tamir
  • Political Science
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • 2021
The doctrine of stare decisis famously instructs judges to respect past decisions even if they believe these decisions are wrong. Many believe stare decisis serves venerable values and bemoan itsExpand
Sixth Amendment and Juveniles
The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, by way of the Fourteenth Amendment, guarantees a number of rights to adults in state criminal prosecutions. Rights embodied in the SixthExpand
Local Governance and Redistributive Policy: Explaining Local Funding for Public Defense
In many American states, public defense is provided at the county rather than state level (Langton & Farole 2009). Local governments have discretion over implementing and funding the right toExpand


); cf. The Supreme Court
  • 1961
See also Henkin, Some Reflections on Current Constitutional Controversy, 109 U
  • PA. L. REV
  • 1961
There are many states, however, that have held that appointment of counsel is not constitutionally required. See Brief for the American Civil Liberties Union in Gideon
  • 1961
cases cited note 59 supra
  • 1961
Kamisar, supra note 186, at 228-30
  • 1960
See articles cited in Holly v. Smyth, 280 F
  • 1960
United Stater v
  • 1960
The Supreme Court, Federalism, and State Criminal Justice, 8 DE PAUL L
  • REV
  • 1959
The Supreme Court and State Criminal Justice, 4 WAYNE L. REV
  • 1958