Getting in Touch: How imagined, actual, and physical contact affect evaluations of robots

@article{Wullenkord2016GettingIT,
  title={Getting in Touch: How imagined, actual, and physical contact affect evaluations of robots},
  author={Ricarda Wullenkord and Marlena R. Fraune and Friederike Eyssel and Selma {\vS}abanovi{\'c}},
  journal={2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)},
  year={2016},
  pages={980-985}
}
Although it is widely accepted that robots will be used in everyday contexts in near future, many people feel anxious and hold negative attitudes toward robots. [] Key Result Results showed that nearly any type of contact effectively reduced negative emotions compared to the control condition. However, for participants with preexisting negative emotions toward robots, contact sometimes produced more negative attitudes. We discuss these findings and the resulting implications for future research.

Figures and Tables from this paper

That Robot Touch that Means so Much: On the Psychological Effects of Human-Robot Touch
TLDR
Four empirical studies were conducted that untangled the perception of human-robot touch referring to research on interpersonal touch, to test whether the media equation also applies to a fundamental interpersonal phenomenon such as touch.
Imagine how to behave: the influence of imagined contact on human–robot interaction
TLDR
Results showed that perceived HRI quality was evaluated more positively and participants displayed more social behaviour towards the robot when the imagined task resembled the HRI that followed, compared to when it did not resemble the subsequent HRI.
Getting to Know You: Relationship Between Intergroup Contact and Willingness to Interact
TLDR
Results indicated that contact with the robot, compared with the Control condition, produced a marginally higher willingness to interact with robots.
A Systematic Review of Attitudes, Anxiety, Acceptance, and Trust Towards Social Robots
TLDR
The findings suggest that people generally have positive attitudes towards social robots and are willing to interact with them, which may challenge some of the existing doubt surrounding the adoption of robotics in social domains of application.
Inviting Robot Touch (By Design)
What is the role of touch in inviting social interaction with robots? Forms of functional haptics in collaboration and socially assistive robots for example indicate one pathway. But what of more
Great Expectations? Relation of Previous Experiences With Social Robots in Real Life or in the Media and Expectancies Based on Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment
TLDR
Results indicate that people’s experiences with robots in the media lead to high expectations regarding the skills of robots, which in turn increase people's general expectancies regarding social robots being part of the society as well as their personal lives.
The Effect of Individual Differences and Repetitive Interactions on Explicit and Implicit Attitudes Towards Robots
The exploitation of Social Assistive Robotics (SAR) will bring to the emergence of a new category of users, namely experts in clinical rehabilitation, who do not have a background in robotics. The
“Danger, Will Robinson!” The challenges of social robots for intergroup relations
Society's increasing reliance on robots in everyday life provides exciting opportunities for social psychologists to work with engineers in the nascent field of social robotics. In contrast to
Threatening Flocks and Mindful Snowflakes: How Group Entitativity Affects Perceptions of Robots
TLDR
Results indicate that Entitative robot groups, compared to Single robots, were viewed more negatively and were also more threatening than Diverse robots, which indicates that robot group entitativity and diversity is critical to keep in mind when designing robots.
Mindless Robots get Bullied
  • M. Keijsers, C. Bartneck
  • Psychology
    2018 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)
  • 2018
TLDR
It is concluded that dehumanisation occurs inhuman-robot interaction and that like in human-human interaction, it is linked to aggressive behaviour.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 42 REFERENCES
‘Give me a hug’: the effects of touch and autonomy on people's responses to embodied social agents
TLDR
Results show that communicative touch could be considered a more appropriate behaviour for proactive agents rather than reactive agents, and that people that are generally more positive towards robots find robots that interact by touch less machine‐like.
An Investigation of Responses to Robot-Initiated Touch in a Nursing Context
TLDR
The results suggest that roboticists should consider this social factor in addition to the mechanics of physical interaction when considering how people respond to the robot’s actions.
The relation between people's attitude and anxiety towards robots in human-robot interaction
TLDR
The utility of negative attitude and anxiety to explain human behavior in interactions with robots is supported and a human-robot interaction (HRI) changes people's attitudes and anxiety towards robots.
The pleasure of receiving a head massage from a robot
TLDR
The results show that receiving a massage by a human masseur is significantly more enjoyable than receiving it by a robot or by oneself, and it is concluded that a robotic massage is a promising field for human robot interaction for further investigation.
The Role of Affective Touch in Human-Robot Interaction: Human Intent and Expectations in Touching the Haptic Creature
TLDR
This paper examines how humans communicate emotional state through touch to the Haptic Creature and their expectations of its reactions, and presents five tentative categories of “intent” that overlap emotion states: protective, comforting, restful, affectionate, and playful.
How to Touch Humans: Guidelines for Social Agents and Robots That Can Touch
  • J. V. Erp, A. Toet
  • Psychology
    2013 Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction
  • 2013
TLDR
The credibility of three premises that make the case that providing touch capability to social robots will increase their effectiveness in communicating emotions, building trust and achieving behavioral changes are shown.
Empathic Touch by Relational Agents
TLDR
It is shown that when touch is used in the context of an empathic, comforting interaction, it can lead to better perceptions of relationship with the agent, but only for users who are comfortable being touched by other people.
Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions? Reducing prejudice through simulated social contact.
TLDR
The authors discuss empirical research supporting the imagined contact proposition and find it to be an approach that is at once deceptively simple and remarkably effective in encouraging more positive intergroup relations.
Judging a bot by its cover: An experiment on expectation setting for personal robots
TLDR
It is found that people's initial beliefs about the robot's capabilities are indeed influenced by expectation setting tactics, and erring on the side of setting expectations lower rather than higher led to less disappointment and more positive appraisals of the robots' competence.
Imagining Intergroup Contact Can Improve Intergroup Attitudes
We investigated whether simply imagining contact with outgroup members can improve intergroup attitudes. In Experiment 1, young participants who imagined talking to an elderly person subsequently
...
...