Getting Rid of Performance Ratings: Genius or Folly? A Debate

@article{Adler2016GettingRO,
  title={Getting Rid of Performance Ratings: Genius or Folly? A Debate},
  author={Seymour Adler and Michael A. Campion and Alan L. Colquitt and Amy Rose Grubb and Kevin J. Murphy and Rob Ollander-Krane and Elaine D. Pulakos},
  journal={Industrial and Organizational Psychology},
  year={2016},
  volume={9},
  pages={219 - 252}
}
Despite years of research and practice, dissatisfaction with performance appraisal is at an all-time high. Organizations are contemplating changes to their performance management systems, the most controversial of which is whether to eliminate performance ratings. The pros and cons of retaining performance ratings were the subject of a lively, standing-room-only debate at the 2015 Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology conference in Philadelphia (Adler, 2015). Given the high… 
The Relationship Between the Number of Raters and the Validity of Performance Ratings
In the focal article “Getting Rid of Performance Ratings: Genius or Folly? A Debate,” two groups of authors argued the merits of performance ratings (Adler et al., 2016). Despite varied views, both
How Will Getting Rid of Performance Ratings Affect Managers?
Amid the debate about getting rid of formal performance ratings, the practical implications for managers should be carefully considered. Adler et al. (2016) acknowledged some implications for
Efficiency Ratings and Performance Appraisals in the United States Federal Government
As industrial–organizational (I-O) psychologists and longtime employees, we have developed and implemented appraisal systems and have been subjected to and have subjected others to appraisals. We
Construct Validity Evidence for Multisource Performance Ratings: Is Interrater Reliability Enough?
  • Jisoo Ock
  • Psychology
    Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • 2016
As organizations become decentralized and work becomes team based, organizations are adopting performance management practices that integrate employees’ performance information from multiple
Working With Social Comparisons in the Appraisal and Management of Performance
  • R. Jelley
  • Business
    Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • 2016
Research and practice in performance appraisal and performance management seem to suffer from the same “delusion of absolute performance” that Rosenzweig (2007, p. 112) described with respect to
Time To Change the Bathwater: Correcting Misconceptions About Performance Ratings
Recent commentary has suggested that performance management (PM) is fundamentally “broken,” with negative feelings from managers and employees toward the process at an all-time high (Pulakos, Hanson,
Beyond Performance Ratings: The Long Road to Effective Performance Management
Performance evaluation has long been a source of dissatisfaction for practitioners and a focus of research for scholars. The current call for the elimination of performance ratings is not new. This
The Future of Performance Ratings: Collected Thoughts From Six Emerging Scholars
During the fall 2015 semester, I (i.e., the last author of this response) taught a doctoral seminar on performance appraisal. Although this course was a general survey of research and theory
Why Performance Appraisal Does Not Lead to Performance Improvement: Excellent Performance as a Function of Uniqueness Instead of Uniformity
Dissatisfaction with performance appraisal is at an all-time high (Adler et al., 2016). In this commentary we argue that one of the reasons why performance appraisal is unable to get the most out of
Why Performance Appraisal Does Not Lead to Performance Improvement: Excellent Performance as a Function of Uniqueness Instead of Uniformity
Dissatisfaction with performance appraisal is at an all-time high (Adler et al., 2016). In this commentary we argue that one of the reasons why performance appraisal is unable to get the most out of
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 177 REFERENCES
Improvements in Performance Management Through the Use of 360 Feedback
The purpose of this commentary is to complement the lead article by Pulakos, Mueller Hanson, Arad, and Moye (2015) by proposing the incorporation of 360 feedback as another means of improving
EMPLOYEE REACTIONS TO PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: A REVIEW AND RESEARCH PROPOSITIONS
Although the use of evaluative performance standards is common in most organizations, research in our field has focused almost exclusively on selection standards (and predictor cut-off scores),
Reinventing performance management
Like many other companies, Deloitte realized that its system for evaluating the work of employees—and then training them, promoting them, and paying them accordingly—was increasingly out of step with
Performance appraisal : state of the art in practice
Foreword - Manual London. Preface. The Authors. THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL ENVIRONMENT. 1. Effective Performance Management: A Focus on Precison, Customers, and Situational Constraints. 2. Current
Performance Appraisal, Performance Management, and Firm-Level Performance: A Review, a Proposed Model, and New Directions for Future Research
AbstractThere has been a long history in management and industrial/organizational psychology of studying methods to improve performance at work. These efforts have traditionally been concerned with
Are performance appraisal ratings from different rating sources comparable?
TLDR
Results suggest that the rating instrument could be regarded as invariant across the rater groups, thus supporting the practice of directly comparing their ratings, as well as for understanding the meaning of between-source rating discrepancies.
Consistency of rating accuracy and rating errors in the judgment of human performance.
  • W. C. Borman
  • Psychology
    Organizational behavior and human performance
  • 1977
DOES PERFORMANCE IMPROVE FOLLOWING MULTISOURCE FEEDBACK? A THEORETICAL MODEL, META‐ANALYSIS, AND REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL FINDINGS
We review evidence showing that multisource feedback ratings are related to other measures of leadership effectiveness and that different rater sources conceptualize performance in a similar manner.
Sources of Political Distortions in Performance Appraisals
Although performance appraisal research has been ongoing for more than 50 years, the focus has largely been on the rater and the rating instruments. This study seeks to answer a more recent call by
THE CONTROL OF BIAS IN RATINGS: A THEORY OF RATING
Based on several years of research and a careful analysis of the rating process Wherry developed a theory of rating. An accurate rating is seen as being a function of three major components:
...
...