Gettier and the method of explication: a 60 year old solution to a 50 year old problem

@article{Olsson2015GettierAT,
  title={Gettier and the method of explication: a 60 year old solution to a 50 year old problem},
  author={Erik J. Olsson},
  journal={Philosophical Studies},
  year={2015},
  volume={172},
  pages={57-72}
}
  • E. Olsson
  • Published 2015
  • Philosophy
  • Philosophical Studies
I challenge a cornerstone of the Gettier debate: that a proposed analysis of the concept of knowledge is inadequate unless it entails that people don’t know in Gettier cases. I do so from the perspective of Carnap’s methodology of explication. It turns out that the Gettier problem per se is not a fatal problem for any account of knowledge, thus understood. It all depends on how the account fares regarding other putative counter examples and the further Carnapian desiderata of exactness… 
Knowledge and the Gettier Problem
Edmund Gettier's 1963 verdict about what knowledge is not has become an item of philosophical orthodoxy, accepted by philosophers as a genuine epistemological result. It assures us that - contrary to
Explicationist Epistemology and the Explanatory Role of Knowledge
It has been argued that much of contemporary epistemology can be unified under Carnap’s methodology of explication, which originated in the neighboring field of philosophy of science. However, it is
On Strawson’s critique of explication as a method in philosophy
TLDR
It is argued that this is an unfair characterisation of Strawson’s critique, spelling out the critique in more detail and showing that, fully understood, it is not undermined by extant responses.
Strawson ’ s critique of explication as a method in philosophy Journal Item
In the course of theorising, it can be appropriate to replace one concept—a folk concept, or one drawn from an earlier stage of theorising—with a more precise counterpart. The best-known account of
Carnapian Explication and the Canberra Plan’s Conceptual Analysis
Conceptual analysis has been typically recognized as a traditional methodology within analytic philosophy, but many philosophers have heavily criticized it. In contrast, the methodology of Carnapian
Explicating the concept of epistemic rationality
TLDR
It is essential, it is argued, that the normativity of rationality, and the purpose, or goal, for which the particular theory of rationality is being proposed, is taken into account when explicating the concept of rationality.
Conceptual re-engineering: from explication to reflective equilibrium
  • G. Brun
  • Computer Science
    Synthese
  • 2017
TLDR
Carnap and Goodman’s methods are historically closely related, their structural interconnections are analyzed, and it is argued that there is great systematic potential in interpreting them as aspects of one method, which ultimately must be conceived as a component of theory development.
Objectivity and orgasm: the perils of imprecise definitions
Lloyd (The case of the female orgasm: bias in the science of evolution, Harvard University Press, Harvard, 2005) analyzes every proposed evolutionary explanation of female orgasm and argues that all
Explicationist Epistemology and Epistemic Pluralism
I discuss Carnap’s method of explication with special emphasis on its application to epistemology. I observe that explication has the advantage over conceptual analysis of not being vulnerable to the
Conceptual engineering, truth, and efficacy
TLDR
‘functional’ approaches to conceptual engineering are examined, ultimately arguing for a ‘radical’ functionalism according to which even revisions which ‘change the subject’ are permitted, and successful re-engineering is constrained only by the requirement that continuity in needed functions of a pre-engineering concept be maintained somewhere in the postengineering conceptual scheme.
...
1
2
3
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 37 REFERENCES
Knowledge and the state of nature : an essay in conceptual synthesis
Nature and motivation of project. Doubts answered. Plato, Pears, Hobbes, comparison with state-of-nature theory in political philosophy. Evolutionary epistemology Derivation of first condition the
Reliabilism, Stability, and the Value of Knowledge
Kxnowledge, as Plato was the first to point out, is more valuable than mere true belief.' Any account of knowledge that failed to make room for this common-sense observa tion would be defective.
The inescapability of Gettier problems
Gettier problems arise in the theory of knowledge when it is only by chance that a justified true belief is true. Since the belief might easily have been false in these cases, it is normally
Why the generality problem is everybody’s problem
The generality problem is widely considered to be a devastating objection to reliabilist theories of justification. My goal in this paper is to argue that a version of the generality problem applies
The instability of philosophical intuitions: Running hot and cold on truetemp
A growing body of empirical literature challenges philosophers’ reliance on intuitions as evidence based on the fact that intuitions vary according to factors such as cultural and educational
Word and Object
TLDR
This edition offers a new preface by Quine's student and colleague Dagfinn Follesdal that describes the never-realized plans for a second edition of Word and Object, in which Quine would offer a more unified treatment of the public nature of meaning, modalities, and propositional attitudes.
Normativity and Epistemic Intuitions
In this paper we propose to argue for two claims. The first is that a sizeable group of epistemological projects – a group which includes much of what has been done in epistemology in the analytic
Reliabilism and the Value of Knowledge
1. W EAK K NOWLEDGE I S M ERE T RUE B ELIEF It is a widely accepted doctrine in epistemology that knowledge has greater value than mere true belief. But although epistemologists regularly pay homage
Knowledge and Grounds: A Comment on Mr. Gettier's Paper
In his paper “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?” (Analysib 23.6, June 1963) Mr. Gettier provides two counter-examples which show that it need not be. In each case a proposition which is in fact
A RELIABILISM BUILT ON COGNITIVE CONVERGENCE: AN EMPIRICALLY GROUNDED SOLUTION TO THE GENERALITY PROBLEM
Abstract Process-reliabilist analyses of justification and knowledge face the generality problem. Recent discussion of this problem turns on certain untested empirical assumptions that this paper
...
1
2
3
4
...