Geoengineering and Climate Change Polarization

@article{Kahan2015GeoengineeringAC,
  title={Geoengineering and Climate Change Polarization},
  author={Dan Kahan and Hank C. Jenkins-Smith and Tor Tarantola and Carol L. Silva and Donald Braman},
  journal={The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science},
  year={2015},
  volume={658},
  pages={192 - 222}
}
The cultural cognition thesis posits that individuals rely extensively on cultural meanings in forming perceptions of risk. The logic of the cultural cognition thesis suggests that a two-channel science communication strategy, combining information content (“Channel 1”) with cultural meanings (“Channel 2”), could promote open-minded assessment of information across diverse communities. We test this kind of communication strategy in a two-nation (United States, n = 1,500; England, n = 1,500… 

Climate change, values, and the cultural cognition thesis

Climate change, cultural cognition, and media effects: Worldviews drive news selectivity, biased processing, and polarized attitudes

The findings show that individuals possessing strongly held cultural worldviews, not only choose news outlets where they expect to find culturally congruent arguments about climate change, but they also selectively process the arguments they encounter.

Geoengineering, moral hazard, and trust in climate science: evidence from a survey experiment in Britain

Geoengineering could be taken by the public as a way of dealing with climate change without reducing greenhouse gas emissions. This paper presents the results of survey experiments testing whether

Public Perception of geoengineering and its consequences for public debate

Reviewing the existing studies of public perception and drawing analogies from other risk technologies, this paper explores the public positions on research and implementation of geoengineering as a

Climate Change Conceptual Change: Scientific Information Can Transform Attitudes

Of this article's seven experiments, the first five demonstrate that virtually no Americans know the basic global warming mechanism. Fortunately, Experiments 2-5 found that 2-45 min of

Improving Skeptics' Reasoning When Evaluating Climate Change Material: A Cognitive Intervention

Abstract A sizeable portion of populations around the world deny that humans are responsible for climate change despite scientific consensus to the contrary. Decades of psychological theory and

Forest Owners' Response to Climate Change: University Education Trumps Value Profile

Using survey data collected in 2010 from 766 private forest owners in Sweden and Germany, this work provides the first evidence that perceptions of climate change risk are uncorrelated with, or sometimes positively correlated with, education level and can be explained without reference to cultural or other values.

A Partisan and Polarized Issue in the United States

Climate change has become a politically polarized issue within the past 30 years, as interest groups and certain political leaders sought to dispute the growing scientific consensus about its causes
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 67 REFERENCES

Climate-Science Communication and the Measurement Problem

This paper examines the science-of-science-communication measurement problem. In its simplest form, the problem reflects the use of externally invalid measures of the dynamics that generate cultural

The Polarizing Impact of Science Literacy and Numeracy on Perceived Climate Change Risks

Seeming public apathy over climate change is often attributed to a deficit in comprehension. The public knows too little science, it is claimed, to understand the evidence or avoid being misled.

Cultural Characters and Climate Change: How Heroes Shape Our Perception of Climate Science†

type="main"> This research examines how narrative communication structures influence the public's perceptions of risk and policy preferences related to climate change. An Internet-based experiment is

Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty

The Royal Society has recently published a report on geoengineering - deliberately manipulating the climate. Their survey of the techniques and possibilities is useful and clear, and explores some of

Cultural cognition of scientific consensus

Why do members of the public disagree – sharply and persistently – about facts on which expert scientists largely agree? We designed a study to test a distinctive explanation: the cultural cognition

Exploring early public responses to geoengineering

Preliminary evidence on public responses to geoengineering from two of the very first UK studies of public perceptions and responses is presented, and it is concluded that public perceptions are likely to prove a key element influencing the debate over questions of the acceptability of geoengineering proposals.

Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection

Decision scientists have identified various plausible sources of ideological polarization over climate change, gun violence, national security, and like issues that turn on empirical evidence. This

Does Geoengineering Present a Moral Hazard?

Geoengineering, a set of unconventional, untested, and risky proposals for responding to climate change, has attracted growing attention in the wake of our collective failure so far to mitigate

Motivated Numeracy and Enlightened Self-Government

Abstract Why does public conflict over societal risks persist in the face of compelling and widely accessible scientific evidence? We conducted an experiment to probe two alternative answers: the

Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology.

An experimental study aimed at determining how members of the public would react to balanced information about nanotechnology risks and benefits yielded strong evidence that public attitudes are likely to be shaped by psychological dynamics associated with cultural cognition.
...