Genitals and ethnicity: the politics of genital modifications

@article{Johnsdotter2010GenitalsAE,
  title={Genitals and ethnicity: the politics of genital modifications},
  author={S. Johnsdotter and B. Ess{\'e}n},
  journal={Reproductive Health Matters},
  year={2010},
  volume={18},
  pages={29 - 37}
}
  • S. Johnsdotter, B. Essén
  • Published 2010
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Reproductive Health Matters
  • Abstract The discrepancy in societal attitudes toward female genital cosmetic surgery for European women and female genital cutting in primarily African girl children and women raises the following fundamental question. How can it be that extensive genital modifications, including reduction of labial and clitoral tissue, are considered acceptable and perfectly legal in many European countries, while those same societies have legislation making female genital cutting illegal, and the World… CONTINUE READING
    77 Citations

    Topics from this paper

    Current critiques of the WHO policy on female genital mutilation
    • 6
    • PDF
    Ethical and Sociocultural Aspects of Sexual Function and Dysfunction in Both Sexes.
    • 77
    • PDF
    Meaning well while doing harm: compulsory genital examinations in Swedish African girls
    • 18
    The Problem of Female Genital Cutting: Bridging Secular and Islamic Bioethical Perspectives
    • 1
    The Effects of Female Genital Mutilation on Women of Sierra Leone
    • 3

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 56 REFERENCES
    Female genital mutilation in the West: traditional circumcision versus genital cosmetic surgery
    • 60
    • PDF
    Pleasure and orgasm in women with Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C).
    • 153
    • PDF
    Female Genital Mutilation and its Psychosexual Impact
    • 118
    The long‐term reproductive health consequences of female genital cutting in rural Gambia: a community‐based survey
    • 225
    • PDF
    The consequences of female circumcision for health and sexuality: an update on the evidence.
    • 182