Genetic and fossil evidence for the origin of modern humans.

@article{Stringer1988GeneticAF,
  title={Genetic and fossil evidence for the origin of modern humans.},
  author={Chris B Stringer and Peter W. Andrews},
  journal={Science},
  year={1988},
  volume={239 4845},
  pages={
          1263-8
        }
}
The origin of living Homo sapiens has once again been the subject of much debate. Genetic data on present human population relationships and data from the Pleistocene fossil hominid record are used to compare two contrasting models for the origin of modern humans. Both genetics and paleontology support a recent African origin for modern humans rather than a long period of multiregional evolution accompanied by gene flow. 
Modern Humans: Origin and Evolution
Modern humans originated recently in geological time from a diverse African gene pool. Very little if any interbreeding probably occurred with existing archaic human populations outside of AfricaExpand
Origin of Modern Humans: Interpreting the Molecular Evidence
Patterns of genetic diversity within our species imply that we descended from a small number of ancestors, of the order of several thousands. While early genetic evidence suggested major populationExpand
The contribution of genetic ancestry from archaic humans to modern humans
Fossil, archaeological, and genetic evidence are united in supporting a recent African origin of modern humans and dispersal out of Africa within the past 60,000–80,000 years. However, genomeExpand
Modern Human Origins: The ‘Out of Africa’ Debate
TLDR
There is still debate over whether this was a speciation event that replaced other human populations outside of Africa, or whether there was genetic mixture. Expand
GENETICS OF MODERN HUMAN ORIGINS AND DIVERSITY
TLDR
Although the genetic data do provide support for the recent African origin model, they also are compatible with the multiregional model and neither model of modern human origins is unequivocally supported to the exclusion of the other. Expand
Human evolution from the Miocene to the Present
Based on morphological, palaeoanthropological and molecular biological studies, human evolution from the Miocene to the Present has been reviewed. The initial divergence of orangutan from theExpand
No evidence of a Neanderthal contribution to modern human diversity
TLDR
The available evidence is reviewed and there is no indication of any Neanderthal contribution to modern genetic diversity. Expand
A genetic legacy from archaic Homo.
TLDR
This example may suggest that the evolution of human cognition depended in part on the genetic legacy of archaic groups such as the Neanderthals, and several genetic loci are candidates for such introgression. Expand
Has the combination of genetic and fossil evidence solved the riddle of modern human origins?
TLDR
It is argued that the fossil record and archeological evidence constrain interpretation of the genetic evidence and imply that very little, if any, admixture with Eurasian archaic hominins such as the Neanderthals occurred during the spread of modern humans out of Africa. Expand
Genetics and the human lineage
TLDR
Investigation of mitochondrial DNA, Y-chromosome DNA, and other genetic polymorphisms have shed light on the size of human populations through hominid history, and recent genetic discoveries have contributed to unravelling the phylogenetic history of distinctive human traits. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 39 REFERENCES
Population relationships of later Pleistocene hominids: A multivariate study of available crania
Abstract The Neanderthal populations of the Upper Pleistocene have been regarded by a number of anthropologists as direct ancestors to modern man. Results of multivariate analyses conducted in thisExpand
Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution
TLDR
All these mitochondrial DMAs stem from one woman who is postulated to have lived about 200,000 years ago, probably in Africa, implying that each area was colonised repeatedly. Expand
Explaining modern man: Evolutionists Versus migrationists
TLDR
The two hypotheses are irreconcilable, but present evidence does not disprove either, and crucial skeletal evidence, with firm dates, is not yet available to settle the main questions of time and place or origins. Expand
Regional continuity in Australasian Pleistocene hominid evolution.
TLDR
It is argued that the "center and edge" hypothesis could account for the initial appearance of regional variation, and that a dynamic model of geneflow and opposing selection provides the mechanism that maintained a long-standing dynamic clinal equilibrium in Australasia during the middle and late Pleistocene. Expand
The Neandertals and Modern Human Origins
TLDR
There has been increased interest in these Upper Pleistocene humans in recent decades, which has resulted in new attempts to comprehend their place in hominid phylogeny, the significance of their morphological pattern, and the evolutionary origins of anatomically modern humans. Expand
On the number of members of the genus Homo who have ever lived, and some evolutionary implications.
  • K. Weiss
  • Biology, Medicine
  • Human biology
  • 1984
TLDR
A revised estimate is that there have been about 44 billion members of the genus Homo from its origins 4.5 million years ago to the evolution of Homo erectus and another 51 billion persons since the neolithic. Expand
Occipital bunning among later Pleistocene Hominids.
Occipital bunning is a posterior projection of the occipital squama, which occurs in varying frequencies in samples of archaic Homo sapiens, Upper Pleistocene anatomically modern humans, and recentExpand
Evolutionary relationships of human populations from an analysis of nuclear DNA polymorphisms
TLDR
It is found that all non-African populations share a limited number of common haplotypes whereas Africans have predominantly a different haplotype not found in other populations. Expand
The Influence of Gene Flow on Genetic Distance
A very small amount of migration was found to significantly alter estimates of genetic distance, even when a large spatial distance separated populations. The effect of migration did not depend onExpand
Species recognition in human paleontology
TLDR
It is not clear why all the various morphs distinguishable in the Middle-to-Late Pleistocene are generally subsumed within the single species Homo sapiens, and it is thus important to ensure that they are not relegated to the epiphenomenological status of subspecies unless there is compelling reason for doing so. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
...