Generating Evidence for Comparative Effectiveness Research Using More Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trials

@article{Mullins2010GeneratingEF,
  title={Generating Evidence for Comparative Effectiveness Research Using More Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trials},
  author={Professor C. Daniel Mullins and Danielle Whicher and Emily S. Reese and Sean R. Tunis},
  journal={PharmacoEconomics},
  year={2010},
  volume={28},
  pages={969-976}
}
Comparative effectiveness research (CER), or research design to meet the needs of post-regulatory decision makers, has been brought into the spotlight with the introduction of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which provided $US1.1 billion over 2 years to support CER. In the short run, the majority of this money will be invested in observational studies and building of infrastructure; however, in the long run, we will likely see an increase in the number of randomized controlled… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.
15 Citations
19 References
Similar Papers

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 15 extracted citations

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 19 references

National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT): evaluation of lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema

  • National Heart, Lung, Blood Institute
  • May 20 [online]. Available from URL: http://www…
  • 2003
Highly Influential
4 Excerpts

Randomized controlled trials do not reflect reality: real-world analyses are critical for treatment guidelines

  • MT Grapow, R von Wattenwyl, U Guller
  • J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
  • 2006
1 Excerpt

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…